TPO 42

Essay topics:

TPO 42

In this set of materials the readig passages discuses that the glasses that use as desing for buildings led to harm to birds so suggested some solution to avoid from happen for birds. While the professor in the listening casts doupt on what is presented in the text and believes that the solution that mentioned in the reading passages is not really practical.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that using one-way glass that is transparent only in one direction can used as a good solution. However, the propfessor claims that the problem of this way is that this kind of glass reflected the sunlight as a mirror and the birds have not ability of indentifing mirror and also this glass reflected the sky color and pictur so it is can itself as a threaten for birds.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that using paint colorful lines or some designs can solve this problem. He says that birds see this designs as a holes and it is led to they move toward its, And to prevent brids do that the design or paints should be present in the big size and in this condition people can not see the out side of building. Therefore this solyution is not practical.
Finally, in the text it is stated that using artificial field to help birds for stay away from buildings. the professor subscribes that it is true that birds used magnetic fieds to navigate but they used this abibility for long way travels for example, going from cold area to wormer region before winter. But they used their eyes for short trips for example uin the cities. so this solution is unreasonable.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-06 Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya 60 view
2022-08-21 mmorteza 80 view
2022-08-21 mmorteza 80 view
2021-11-14 lutzuming 80 view
2021-10-24 Pariakarimi 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e as desing for buildings led to harm to birds so suggested some solution to avoi...
^^
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...ected the sky color and pictur so it is can itself as a threaten for birds. In add...
^^^
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...color and pictur so it is can itself as a threaten for birds. In addition, the professor ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...n this condition people can not see the out side of building. Therefore this solyution i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e can not see the out side of building. Therefore this solyution is not practical. Final...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...elp birds for stay away from buildings. the professor subscribes that it is true th...
^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...short trips for example uin the cities. so this solution is unreasonable.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, kind of, first of all, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59233449477 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38374386656 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515679442509 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7583434632 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392642764425 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136763364908 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777749589614 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227121535929 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039587843291 0.0443174109184 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.