Pets should be treated like family members.
No one can deny that there can be many opinions on whether pets should be treated like family members or not. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely treat them the same way I would treat my family members. It is my firm belief that pets should be considered as a family member, for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, pets do not have any materialistic desire as one would expect from a family member. They always expect love and affection from their human friends and in return they demand nothing. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. My parents never wanted a pet in the house but me and my sister always requested them to at least talk to people who have been caretaking an animal. My neighbor convinced my parents that how a pet can bring all the joy to a person's life and sometimes also act as a stress buster. For this reason, I believe that people should see pet from a different perspective and treat them like a family member.
Secondly, humans should never hit or misbehave with their pets just because they do not obey commands. Animal behavior should be understood as they cannot convey their message in a way that humans can understand, so one should always try their best to comprehend the behavior. I do not disagree with the fact that taking care of an animal can be an arduous task but then by not treating them properly cannot be a solution to the problem. So in my opinion people should only take responsibility for a pet only when they have a firm mindset because even they have emotions as humans do.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that pet should be treated like family members
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-24 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | groot | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | nida fatima | 35 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | vishaljuvekar10 | 60 | view |
| 2020-04-03 | DaVa20011218 | 73 | view |
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do Do you agree or disagree 70
- “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 76
- “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 70
- “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world." Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...at how a pet can bring all the joy to a persons life and sometimes also act as a stress...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[2]
Message: Consider using 'do disagree that' or 'do agree that'.
Suggestion: do disagree that; do agree that
...heir best to comprehend the behavior. I do not disagree with the fact that taking care of an animal can be an ardu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, at least, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58125 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53471021211 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1153461502 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426635339185 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165798448934 0.076458572812 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146883986198 0.0737576698707 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338505226933 0.150856017488 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159739114588 0.0645574589148 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.