Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Forecast the future is quite easy. Hard is to be exact about when and who it is going to make it happen. I have heard that sentence once, from some executive of the technology market. His explanations about his affirmation was very understandable and useful to answer questions such as sustainable deployment. Of course, in the future cars will decrease in number and growth in efficiency. What is anybody’s guess is when the global population will have access to those innovations. The same goes with all the probable changes for the next years.

Urgently, the world needs sustainability and a proper look to the environment. Cities have a chaotic traffic, lot of cars polluting, inefficient constructions and anyone can be a fortune-teller saying that fossil fuel will disappear and we will need to reuse water and take care of our natural resources. They are far away from being wrong, indeed, their notion of the emergency that we need those changes are even late. A tech development, which we are witnessing, can open ways to an amazing structure to our cities, the rural zones also can be reached and incredibly upgraded. Would be wonderful having fewer cars in a close future, people using mass transit that are green built.

However, we need to be realistic between eco daydreams. Our cities wasn’t ready for these advancements but this is just for arguments sakes, because with a lot of effort it is reachable. A deeper issue is the citizenship, mainly the society of underdeveloped countries, which are the major population on Earth. The lack of education, basic health and conditions, which are submerged in a cycle of poverty and corruption, are a huge bound for evolution. Visiting a place like that you can watch how bad we are. Specifically saying, if cars in USA, Canada and the greats from EU already are inefficient, whose are sophisticated, locations like Brazil, India, Argentina lives with the scum of the tech. Cars are from 90’s and there are many neighborhoods with no basic health or food. The key point for this argument is that there are many countries that can’t follow the advancement yet.

Sustainability is possible, and the global population has a lot to learn yet, but we will someday use, in the right way, renewable sources of energy, food and any raw materials. Innovations and creations will come to help reduce our carbon emission rates, our waste of elements. Cars are now a problem to the environment, polluting the air, sound and there has a lot of psychological issues attached to the wide-spread use of cars in towns. As any problem, someday it will be solved, but answering a question about when, my guess is not near. But how was stated before, it is anybody’s guess.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-25 deeshrestha 60 view
2019-11-24 ellybah 10 view
2019-11-24 ellybah 3 view
2019-10-06 aliola_214 60 view
2019-07-19 hanieh-std 76 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user ueslenbresolin :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mass transit that are green built. However, we need to be realistic between...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, of course, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95887445887 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94760773077 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2739667632 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.64 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.48 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180389485064 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444013538603 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375827297 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107110319296 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016037018733 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.