reduce their expense by some approaches
Throughout history, one of the most problematic issues for a large proportion of human beings has been financial limitations. For this reason, people have been making attempt to reduce their expense by some approaches. If I face the situation in which I have to assist my friend to choose the best way in order to decrease the money he has to spend, I would highly recommend that he looks for a roommate to reach the goal since I believe that this alternative provides him with more benefits in comparison to others. My reasons are manifold, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is that sharing a room with another person has a great impact on his expense. As a matter of fact, they would be able to divide many costs, such as the apartment rent, goods, foods, and so forth, between themselves. For instance, purchasing goods for their home, they can pay less money, on the grounds that several tools can be utilized by both of them like hamper and carpet. Therefore, sharing a room with others most probably decrease their expense noticeably.
Besides reducing the cost of living, finding a roommate leads to numerous merits as well. When two people live with each other, they have the opportunity to get familiar with a novel attitude, culture, and point of view. In addition, they possess the chance of helping each other in their courses which is really beneficial in their learning process. For example, they can tutor some difficult courses, or even cook food sometimes in turn and save a lot of time.
Last but not least is the disadvantages of other choices he has. In other words, other alternatives bring about some serious problems, so they seems implausible to be practical. For example, preparing food at home is indeed time-consuming, and they are most probably busy with their affairs; hence, they cannot spend a high percentage of their time cooking food. Similarly, although at first blush, buying a high-tech mobile looks interesting to many individuals, it is just waste of money in this situation.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that sharing home with one or even two roommates is more advantageous. Not only it contributes to reducing the expense required for renting a house, but it also helps one in other extent. Ultimately, other two possible solutions are not reasonable and efficient enough to be substituted for the given choice. Overall, I would encourage my friend to find a housemate in order to make more advantages.
- TPO47 80
- TPO35 3
- one who cannot accept others' criticism becomes successful in group 90
- Some people believe that the media for example television radio newspapers or Internet news sources are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past These people argue that the media today often present incorrect infor 97
- cane toad 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bly decrease their expense noticeably. Besides reducing the cost of living, fin...
^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...ng about some serious problems, so they seems implausible to be practical. For exampl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'look'?
Suggestion: look
... first blush, buying a high-tech mobile looks interesting to many individuals, it is ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emate in order to make more advantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, look, may, really, similarly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97266514806 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7911142304 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574031890661 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4031644513 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.15 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.95 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166170080835 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553241634986 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085442685874 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947427967786 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251226030774 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.