Your friend is going to reduce the living expenses. Which of the following way would you recommend to your friend and why?
1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.
2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.
3. Shop for less expensive food to cook at home.
Facing with heavy inflation which increases the cost of living, an increasing number of people make decisions to cut their living budget: Some people choose to curtail the expense for housing; some people prefer to cut down expenses of electronic products; some people are predisposed to reduce the expense for food. From my perspective, budget cuts on electronic devices is a desirable option.
First, finding another roommate won’t reduce the living expense at all. Granted, the rent for an apartment can be reduced since another one can share the bills paid for the fixed rent cost. However, other fees can be created when a new roommate move to the house: another roommate will also use the kitchens or bathrooms in their routine life, which might double the fees for electricity or water. Meanwhile, the money paid for daily maintenance will also be increased. All these fees will easily cancel out the saved rent cost.
Second, the budget won’t be cut down by cooking more at home. Granted, purchasing ingredients and then processing them at home can save money since usually the price of food bought in restaurants is higher than the raw materials, given the fact that it includes operating cost and processing cost. However, simply buying less expensive items will cause some healthy problems, which might create another spending. In fact, cheaper food ingredients are less healthier than other expensive ingredients and thus people who consume them are more likely to contract healthy problems, like obesity, diabetes, etc. As a result, they tend to pay for some medicine or medical treatments in order to cure themselves. In this case, saved money can be canceled out.
Compared with the two former options,purchasing fewer expensive electronic devices is highly effective in reducing the living expense. As a matter of fact, the price of electronic device is extremely high in that in order to produce them, a company has to hire widely recognizable artists to design them, purchase raw materials from other countries to create elaborated chips, set up factories for specialized production, and so on. All these operating cost will be reflected on the price of those products, making their price higher than other hand-made products. Meanwhile, those high-tech products update quickly, which means that people who desire to keep up with the pace of their updates must pay for them frequently. Take Iphone, the most popular kind of smart phone of the world, as an example, for the purpose of producing Iphones, Apple has set up hundreds of factories locating in all corners of the world, hired scientists to help to develop more cost-effective battery and designers to make it more portable, purchased expensive silicon to create chips and so on. To compensate for the cost, an single Iphone can cost one hundreds of dollars which can cover a large portion of their salary. Also, Apple updates their products quickly, launching new version of Iphone every 6 months or even shorter, which means that people who desire to update their Iphones have to spend a lot of money in a short time. Thus, if such expense can be reduced, the amount of money can be saved considerably.
In conclusion, in terms of how to curtail the living expense, buying less expensive electronic products should be prioritized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less healthy'?
Suggestion: less healthy
.... In fact, cheaper food ingredients are less healthier than other expensive ingredients and th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , purchasing
... Compared with the two former options,purchasing fewer expensive electronic devices is h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1106, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... and so on. To compensate for the cost, an single Iphone can cost one hundreds of ...
^^
Line 7, column 1132, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'one hundred'
Suggestion: one hundred
...for the cost, an single Iphone can cost one hundreds of dollars which can cover a large port...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1132, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one hundred', 'a hundred', or simply 'hundreds'?
Suggestion: one hundred; a hundred; hundreds
...for the cost, an single Iphone can cost one hundreds of dollars which can cover a large port...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1132, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'one hundred'.
Suggestion: one hundred
...for the cost, an single Iphone can cost one hundreds of dollars which can cover a large portion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2780.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 546.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09157509158 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63461140585 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507326007326 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7468405316 48.9658058833 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.363636364 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227262440191 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737028861959 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700030037867 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154784163884 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037435268023 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.