Scientists should be responsible for negative impacts of their discoveries.
Some people contend that scientists have to shoulder the disadvantages of their brainchild, as they are the main reason of such negative result. However, I hold the opposite view that there are actually many other factors that force researchers to complete those unpleasant impacts.
Admittedly, it is true that, in each process of researches, almost all of the theories come from the scientists who devoted much efforts and time on their researches. Also, the ideas and foundation belong to scientists. Therefore, a voice rises that because of the reasons stated above, scientists should be responsible for the results. However, in my opinion, scientists are only the originators who are responsible for coming up the nascent ideas, while other forces from government or the sponsors are the real ones who should take responsibility.
To begin with, throughout history, many undesirable inventions were from the selfish wills of the government. Think about it, without the numerous monetary supports from the government, even though scientists come up with an idea, they would not be capable of carrying out it. In fact, the government always relegated the scientists to make something, even which has strikingly terrible results. To be more specific, America put forward the researches of nuclear weapon during World War two based on the Einstein's, one of the most famous physicists in history, Relative Theory. At the beginning, Einstein wanted to use such theory to benefit whole people, finding the natures of mysterious things in the universe. Nevertheless, it was used by the government to invent those horrible weapons taking thousands of people's life during that period. In this case, Einstein had nothing to do with the negative impacts of his discoveries.
Apart from that, in the most of time, the origin of researchers' discoveries was to benefit people, instead of making an irreversible result. Some scientists even did not realize the negative impacts of their researches. Criticizing scientists just lead to a fact that none of them dare to immerse into discoveries again, which would stymie the advancement of science and imaginative ideas held by them. Even worse, many followers of these scientists and the students or juveniles owning the interests for science would lose the confidence for their pursuit. Gradually, the country's development on science would be overshadowed by others, leading to the depression of economy and increased rate of unemployment. For example, the strengths of America in each field was due to the focus the government pay on science. They advocate education and publish a great many of policies for scientists. Also, the citizens are respectable for scientists' work. Hence, it is not right to blame on scientists.
In a nutshell, I still maintain that the negative impacts are not researchers' fault, which is determined by diverse factors.
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 79
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 83
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the President of the Amburg Chamber of Commerce Last October the city of Belleville installed high intensity lighting in its central business district and vandalism there declined almost immediately The city 69
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
..., in each process of researches, almost all of the theories come from the scientists who d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...es come from the scientists who devoted much efforts and time on their researches. A...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, as to, for example, in fact, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32897603486 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91999798566 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559912854031 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4249238061 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.347826087 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95652173913 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366298371474 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860824368143 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851059824636 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173237147316 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834704722216 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.