Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?
Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?
History is a controversial debate, including whatever had been occurred for the civilizations over the past million centuries. Nowadays, a plethora of people is in conviction that protection of old buildings is one of the primary duties of each government. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that historic constructions belong to the past and there is no need to be preserved. I am of the opinion that all the choices have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, history is an integral part of each culture as it plays crucial role to form the current societies. Indeed, without the previous occurrences, people live in completely varied circumstance. Therefore, buildings as the symbols of each epoch, are able to convey numerous facts about the governors, citizens, religion related to that period of time, and that is why no one can overlook the high value of these debris.. Besides, architectural monuments talks about the artistic heritage that cultivates pride of the past as it makes them unique in the world. . For instance, the well-known ancient civilization of Iran, Hakamanesh, built admirable constructions - Takht Jamshid. Iranian is still proud of their empire due to his power and logic and peace. Although most of the construction had been demolished, the remains is enough for distinguishing old Iran from many previous countries.
Another significant issue which should be taken into consideration is the economical facets of preservation and restoration. Historical buildings are being accounted as great tourism attractions. Many people are keen to visit spectacular sites which one day they were the spirit of the city. In some countries - such as Turkey, Italy, Greek - that are historically rich, government allocate considerable budget for preserving their buildings to encourage more people to come their countries. Moreover, restoring the local buildings brings more jobs and extra income by applying the growing segment of expertise that becomes unemployment. Adding this note that, undoubtedly, erecting a new building is remarkably more costly, than conserving the old one.
On the basis of the aforementioned above, I am convinced that looking after the historic buildings brings variety of advantages for human. Since people not only get acquainted with the history, culture and even art of that period, but also live in better economical situation which has been improved thanks to load of tourists and new occupations.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait 80
- TPO 40 90
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ors, citizens, religion related to that period of time, and that is why no one can overlook th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... overlook the high value of these debris.. Besides, architectural monuments talks ...
^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t as it makes them unique in the world. . For instance, the well-known ancient ci...
^
Line 11, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re and even art of that period, but also live in better economical situation whic...
^^
Line 11, column 257, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...f that period, but also live in better economical situation which has been improved thank...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248366013072 0.229887763892 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.148148148148 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115468409586 0.0866891130778 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0326797385621 0.046263068375 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0261437908497 0.0685040099705 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119825708061 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0522875816993 0.0351676179071 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04003233124 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0239651416122 0.0309702414327 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104575163399 0.0887237588012 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00871459694989 0.0209618222197 42% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0196078431373 0.0139019557991 141% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2641.0 2387.08602151 111% => OK
No of words: 413.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39467312349 5.86048508987 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394673123487 0.338922669872 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.319612590799 0.251872472559 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242130750605 0.174417080927 139% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.176755447942 0.112833075102 157% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04003233124 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624697336562 0.524397521467 119% => OK
Word variations: 80.0894821222 59.2087087015 135% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6666666667 20.5533526081 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2938756003 48.84282405 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.761904762 120.699889404 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.5533526081 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.619047619048 0.644075263715 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 51.6279257466 45.7405998639 113% => OK
Elegance: 2.03157894737 1.45489161554 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069632083618 0.300154397459 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0490066820758 0.103427244359 47% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0392844125297 0.0752933317313 52% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.484523390647 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.197314144859 0.151897553556 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571340505343 0.114077575197 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.211523391834 0.0781384742642 271% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.331758329169 0.336927656856 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.200657539629 0.067059652881 299% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215383801551 0.210909579961 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.392555783015 0.0618886996521 634% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.