Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?
History is a controversial debate, including whatever had occurred for the civilizations over the past million centuries. Nowadays, a plethora of people is in a conviction that protection of old buildings is one of the primary duties of each government. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that historic constructions belong to the past, and there is no need to be preserved. I am of the opinion that every city- administration should try to refurbish the old buildings, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, history is an integral part of each culture as it plays the crucial role to form the current societies. Indeed, without the previous occurrences, people live in completely varied circumstance. Therefore, buildings as the symbols of each epoch can represent numerous facts, and that is why no one can overlook the high value of this debris. For example, some of them are evidences of foreign invasion; others are signs of religions existed in past decades. Besides, architectural monuments talk about the artistic heritage that cultivates pride of the past as it makes them unique in the world. For instance, the well-known ancient civilization of Iran, Hakamanesh, built admirable constructions - Takht Jamshid. Iranian is still proud of their empire due to his power and logic and peace. Although most of the construction had been demolished, the remains are enough for distinguishing old Iran from many previous countries.
Another significant issue which should be taken into consideration is the economic facets of preservation and restoration. Historical buildings are being accounted as great tourism attractions. Many people are keen to visit spectacular sites which one day they were the spirit of the city. In some countries - such as Turkey, Italy, Greek - that are historically rich, the government allocates considerable budget for preserving their buildings to encourage more people to come to their countries. Moreover, restoring the local buildings brings more jobs and extra income by applying the growing segment of expertise that becomes unemployment. Adding this note that, undoubtedly, erecting a new building is remarkably more costly, than conserving the old one.
On the basis of those mentioned above, I am convinced that although historic buildings may make the appearance of the city a bit obsolete, looking after them brings the variety of advantages for the human. Since it not only has educational functions such as history, culture, and art of that period but also help people to live in a better economic situation which has been improved thanks to a load of tourists and new occupations
- Agree/Disagree Q. If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get successful in life. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should be given money in order to be encouraged in their activities. 73
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s government to take to protect the environment?1. Fund research to develop environmentally friend 86
- TPO 32 85
- Has technology made the world a better place to live? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y no one can overlook the high value of this debris. For example, some of them are e...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238493723849 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.148535564854 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115062761506 0.0866891130778 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0313807531381 0.046263068375 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0271966527197 0.0685040099705 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127615062762 0.118717715034 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0460251046025 0.0351676179071 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04436999954 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251046025105 0.0309702414327 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115062761506 0.0887237588012 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125523012552 0.0209618222197 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0188284518828 0.0139019557991 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2715.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 431.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29930394432 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385150812065 0.338922669872 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315545243619 0.251872472559 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245939675174 0.174417080927 141% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.180974477958 0.112833075102 160% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04436999954 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600928074246 0.524397521467 115% => OK
Word variations: 75.2465971299 59.2087087015 127% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.55 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4970369286 48.84282405 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 53.1045243619 45.7405998639 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.9898989899 1.45489161554 137% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0328867449478 0.300154397459 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0567239104039 0.103427244359 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0384894394278 0.0752933317313 51% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.477598986179 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117418905255 0.151897553556 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0142598604604 0.114077575197 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226511852286 0.0781384742642 29% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.451756003634 0.336927656856 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0665909378182 0.067059652881 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0298504607596 0.210909579961 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174808478999 0.0618886996521 28% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.