Social meadia is a good way to express personal views.
Currently, with the emergence of advanced technology, people are equipped with diversified electronic devices, such as mobile phones, laptops and so on. However, the proliferation of social media has triggered a heated discussion about whether it is a good approach to convey our personal views through social media. Some individuals reckon that individuals ought to avoid voicing their opinions in for fear of the leak of information. Conversely, I harbor the idea that it is an optic choice and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, the existence of social media affords individuals with a platform to express themselves without any restriction. To be more specific, the content they express is not limited, people enjoy the right given by the constitution to deliver their opinions related to diversified domains, like policies, military or scientific researches. Apart from that social media also enables individuals to overcome obstacle generated by time and location. Owing to the characteristic of the non-instant message, people living in different blocks of time can communicate with each other. Meanwhile, sending email or wechat message is also conducive for us to deliver our views to different corners around the world, thus the existence of social media is a good method to express ourselves without any restriction.
What’s more, due to social media’s effect on avoiding face-to-face conversation, it contributes a lot to the enhancement of delivering personal views. Initially, the conversation between individuals is sometimes embarrassed, since they do not want to deteriorate their relationship by upholding divergent opinions. Hence, in the platform of social media, they can maintain an open mind to respect their differences instead of sparing no efforts to convince each other. In addition, owing to the characteristic of online talking, each individual can express their view after serious consideration, which prevents them from making oral errors or false expression.
Admittedly, there are some disadvantages existing in expressing personal views through social media. For instance, it is likely to give rise to the leak of private information, but this disadvantage can be compensated by the upgrade of technology, therefore expressing personal views through social media is a preferred option due to its function on avoiding embarrassment and overcoming obstacles.
- Do you agree or disagree people benefit more from traveling in their own country than in foreign countries 95
- Social media is a good way to express personal views 73
- The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel 90
- A leader should have strong opinions and not change his or her opinions 90
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61580381471 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20613632187 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572207084469 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4476458533 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.4 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210318843644 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734956504846 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722375180728 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134989972284 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304964739682 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 10.9000537634 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.