Some companies decide not to permit employees to reply the e-mail or text associated with the work in the holiday or on the weekend. Some people think that this policy will improve the satisfaction of the employees. While others argue that banning the reply to the e-mail or text associated with the work will decrease the satisfaction of employees. What do you think?
There is no shortage of opinion on whether companies should restrict their employees on replying the e-mails related to their work on the holiday or on the weekend. If I were asked, I would definitely agree with that policy. I will breach some reasons that validate my position.
Let’s consider some pros and cons of the policy suggested above. The first thing that needs to be said is that the employee, who is most satisfied with his job, is the one who has all his life in balance. This particular person has a distinct time for everything; some time is for a job, some for a family and spare time. As you can see from that point of view, this specific advantage of before mentioned policy would help people to keep their life equilibrium. Moreover, it will help employees be more focused on their jobs during the work day, because they will know that job needs to be done today, and they do not have chance to finish it, on the weekends. Also, it will increase their productivity by reducing procrastination. For instance, my cousin worked in one organization with implemented restrictions on access to their systems in order to keep the whole information safe. So my cousin had to do all her work at the place, she could not use her own computer to go to their system and work from her home. She was a big procrastinator until she began to work there. Since a few months of her job, she has changed in her attitude for work. She did it on time and keeps do it till today. It helps her to bring more self-discipline and beat the laziness.
The second reason is that employees who do not need to worry about their work on the days off; which could be a huge disadvantage of not having an aforementioned policy; they obviously can relax at their weekends and recharge themselves for the whole upcoming week. Consequently, people who rested at weekends will have fresh minds and more energy than those who constantly anxious about their work. That is why people will work in their most productive way because they relaxed from it. The companies which embed this policy will have more benefits than those who will not.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that policy which increases productivity and eventually the profit of the companies is the best option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-04 | jeffhjz | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | alicegreen13 | 67 | view |
- Some parents enjoy giving their children weekly spending money; for example, they may give their primary or middle school child a small amount of money each week to spend on whatever the child wants. Some people believe that this practice can cause childr 63
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (ages14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67082294264 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62200685203 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518703241895 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8662008891 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.65 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200856927494 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643719320627 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458015912805 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135528999448 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595984021374 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.