some modern agriculture methods damage environment, people think providing more food for the growing world population is more important than protecting the environment.
In today’s modern life, thanks to the technological breakthrough and cutting-edge innovation in every section of scince, people has faced lots of questions. Some people are of the opinion that enourmous residents are starving , lacking sucrce of food, while I personally subscribe to the view that protecting of our inviroment paly crusial rule for tackle this issue; because of our next generations and saving life of many speceus. In the following paragraphs, my reasons will be elaborated on in more detail.
To begin with, I cannot deny the fact that each person have a priority in the life and it would be living. generally speaking, with saving our inviroment and peresve it for next generation we can reach our gols and priorities. Had our ancestors not saved our natural recurces, life of the humanity would have been destroyed. To delve more into it, our children, for instance, can not benefited from variety of creatures, resulting in extinction. In another example, I remmember that when I was a child, I have experienced differend weathers such as snow, summer rains, and sun shower; whereas, raising globale warming , deoughts and arid seasons are ciuntinued, and my child would not observe them. The point that I want to indicate is we are responsible for next generations to possess safficiant food and water for living.
another reason why I believe our inviroment should be preserved is that based on the morality matters, we cannot annihilate many flora and fauna, becouse of the power of human rather than other speciuse. In fact, all of nature have the right to live. As far as I am concernd, we have nurturd to keep and care of others not destroying them and we have this responsibility for our enviroment. With improved sciences and fostered expertes, nowadays, we have adequate knowladge about both saving our enviroment and providing foods for individuals. As a case in point, scientists have discovered new methods to utilize insect, which is full of nutirients as a source of food instead of meats of cows and ships, which they are ruined inviroment, atributting to over grazing, which needs meticolous attention. Therefore, in order to overcome this issue, with providong another source of food, niether do enviroment, nor do morality devastate in the human life.
Drawing upon the reasons that I mentioned above, I adhire to the fact that we do not have the permission to destroye enviroment, providig food for people. Not only should we preserve it for next generations, but also with this practice we save the morality too. Just as scientific methods are advanced during the years, so should we use them for finding other solution for this comlication.
- some modern agriculture methods damage environment, people think providing more food for the growing world population is more important than protecting the environment. 85
- TPO33-task2 -indp Writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific re 76
- Do you agree or disagree with this"People in the today’s world have become too dependent on automobiles." 80
- Nowadays people are busy with many things If you were given a short period of time what would you choose 1 Learn to play a new sport you never played 2 Learn to cook food in a different way 3 Learn to do some hand made work like clothes 73
- Whether's Chevalier memoir were true or not 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on that enourmous residents are starving , lacking sucrce of food, while I persona...
^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
...ity in the life and it would be living. generally speaking, with saving our inviroment an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...it, our children, for instance, can not benefited from variety of creatures, resulting i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en, for instance, can not benefited from variety of creatures, resulting in extin...
^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...shower; whereas, raising globale warming , deoughts and arid seasons are ciuntinue...
^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hts and arid seasons are ciuntinued, and my child would not observe them. The poi...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...ficiant food and water for living. another reason why I believe our inviroment sho...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r inviroment should be preserved is that based on the morality matters, we cannot...
^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun flora seems to be countable; consider using: 'many florae', 'many floras'.
Suggestion: many florae; many floras
... morality matters, we cannot annihilate many flora and fauna, becouse of the power of huma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s have discovered new methods to utilize insect, which is full of nutirients as a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07191011236 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83788851062 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568539325843 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0038452542 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.388888889 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7222222222 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124596729296 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420708901327 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330116651022 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854464405807 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030229642893 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.