Some people prefer to buy their meals in restaurants very frequently, rather than cooking and eating meals at home. Other people prefer to cook most of their meals at home and only rarely eat in a restaurant.
Which one would you choose and why?
Eating is the most interesting issue for people always. Ancestors were involved with this subject, we are involving nowadays and next generations will be subjected too. What is important here is how to eat various meals. By developing the technology some people prefer to eat their meals in restaurants because of limiting the time, while other have a negative attitude toward it. As far as I am concerned, I agree that it is a good notion to cook the meals at home instead of eating in a restaurant because of two reasons including health issue and financial issue which are two significant topics.
The first reason of current discussion is health subject. In this regard, it should be noted that besides of doing exercise, another factor which has a crucial role in health is the food that we eat in a day. With this in mind, we can say that if we eat healthy food we will decrease the risk of death in our life. One method to reach this goal is preparing the food at home instead of eating outdoor foods since we can cook different foods with low oil and high protein which are so effective on the health of the body. Therefore, preparing the food at home and eat there has a huge impact on the health of the body.
Another noteworthy reason is about the money. Research showed that one of the most considerable problems today's is the financial problem. In this case, we may solve this problem partially by eating our meals at home instead of in a restaurant. It seems logical to say that we spend less money for preparing the food rather than eating prepared food in outdoor. For instance, last weekend I cooked a pizza at my home. I bought its basic substances such as potato, tomato, breed and etc. I prepared pizza with these materials and enjoyed it with my friend in an incredible experience. The momentous point is about the money which we spend on this pizza. It was cheaper than the pizza that we eat in a restaurant. Hence, eating meals at home has a profound effect on the financial subject.
In conclusion, we can reach the consensus that preparing the food at home not only affects our health but also helps us to save our money. It is worth noting that cooking at home has other advantages such as helps us to be skilled in cooking.
- TPO 19 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 20 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 15 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ors were involved with this subject, we are involving nowadays and next generations will be s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ubstances such as potato, tomato, breed and etc. I prepared pizza with these materials a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54411764706 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46940136446 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485294117647 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0383174209 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2727272727 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318938214008 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978942814441 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857604216534 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202166692053 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754262536186 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.