Over the past decades, society activities have developed rapidly. People have a variety of sports for exercise. Some people prefer to play with a group because It can learn from friends, while others prefer to exercise alone for efficiency. Personally, I think play sports within a group is better than doing exercise alone.
First of all, playing sports within a group improve communication skills, and communication skill is essential for people. To be more specific, people have a lot of time to talk to others, and it can improve communication skills and enhance relationships. For example, When I was a student, I like to do exercise with my friends in the gym. When we played a workout, we had more time to talk to each other. It will make us more closely during the process. Moreover, my friends Alex, he also can teach more knowledge about exercise at the same time. As a result, I could learn how to improve my communication skills through sports in the gym and enhance my body. In contrast, if I do exercise alone in the gym, I would have nobody to talk to some common topic. Finally, I can't improve my communication skills. Apparently, playing sport within a group has positive results.
Secondly, playing sport with a group brings more benefits. To illustrate, when we participate in sports competitions, we need to keep brainstorm. Take me for an example, when I played baseball with my friends, we needed to discuss how to get more points and make a strategy in the game. After the brainstorm, we focus on teamwork and found the fault on the competitor. As a result, we got high points in the game. On the other hand, if I played basketball alone, I would never have time to learn from my friends. Thus, I can get more benefits during the group.
In conclusion, I prefer to do exercise within a group. That's to say, and it can help me to improve my communication skills and more benefits.
- Some people prefer to of exercise alone while others would like group sports Which do you prefer 60
- University students are often encouraged to study fields in which significant job growth a large increase in job opportunities is expected these fields currently include science technology engineering and math do you believe students should consider study 70
- If a university wants to attract students it must spend a lot of money on social activities for students 71
- TPO 40 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people's lives has already taken place. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 772, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o talk to some common topic. Finally, I cant improve my communication skills. Appare...
^^^^
Line 8, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...I prefer to do exercise within a group. Thats to say, and it can help me to improve m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70238095238 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77743478608 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470238095238 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3283349124 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.6956521739 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6086956522 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264420274655 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846772073662 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109842483526 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197778486691 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116438767045 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.