Some people say people who are tending to take risks can be more successful than people who are careful and cautious. What is your opinion? Please give specific details and examples in your answer.
To be successful is always desirable for everyone, but people do have different views about what is the key to success. Some claim that people who are willing to take risks have more possibilities to succeed, while others believe that we are supposed to be cautious. From my perspective, we should have different strategies when facing different situations. If we are able to stand the negative effects brought by the failure, taking risks might be a good choice. Otherwise, we had better be cautious.
In some circumstances, taking risks will offer us more chances to make profits and to become successful, but we should make the situation clear and make a right judgment about whether we could stand its failures. For example, many businessmen might invest their money in a wide range of industries, like building industries, business industries and so on. No matter how successful a businessman is, he could never be able to make sure he will win. But what he or she can make sure is that he or she can be responsible for the failure, which is resulted from the risks, and have the capacity to withstand the negative result. We often praise someone for taking risks and succeed, but we seem to fail to take into the basic fact that even if he fails, he still could continue his life.
On another circumstance, if we have not enough ability that allows us to recover from the bad impact brought by taking risks or we have much uncertainty about the results, being careful and cautious could be much wiser. Taking any jobs or making any investment is the way for people to better his lives, but what will happen if the failure of such actions end his lives? Besides successful events, we often hear that some bosses commit suicide due to the failure of investment. This kind of incidents should encourage us to take a comprehensive consideration before taking actions. Without life, nothing will left, not to mention the success. Although taking some risks could make us famous overnight, but it might cause negative results that we cannot afford. Therefore, before the situation becomes clear, we should calm down and keep careful.
From what have been discussed above, people who want to be successful ought to be careful and at the same time being able to take risks. It is unwise for us to always value the one quality more than the other.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on young children’s education than on university education. 81
- Some university teachers prefer to record their lectures before classes In this way students will be familiar with the lecture in advance and teachers help students practice in classes while they are watching or listening lectures Do you think it is an ef 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes. 41
- Agree or disagree: In order to success in study or job，the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or in a field of study. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The advice from our grandparents is no longer useful, for the world has changed so much during the past 50 years. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'leave'
Suggestion: leave
...ing actions. Without life, nothing will left, not to mention the success. Although t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76904176904 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57250151942 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511056511057 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7995075382 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.157894737 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229770543185 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797361278593 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758672966927 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179225054005 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702443173017 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.