Some individuals think that because traditional energy sources like coal and oil are less expensive than cleaner energy options, they are more dependable and practical. To preserve the environment, I believe we should switch to cleaner forms of energy. For three reasons, I'll go into further detail about my points.
First and foremost, cleaner energy can increase societal efficiency since it can enhance environmental quality and lessen pollution. For factories with lots of employees, a better atmosphere can result in improved working conditions, which can increase the manufacturers' output. A constrained environment brought on by conventional energy sources commonly lowers employee motivation in many emerging nations. Product quality and supply are constrained by disgruntled manufacturers. It is obvious that if these nations use cleaner energy, their environment would gradually improve and their overall social efficiency will increase.
Second, cleaner energy has the potential to accelerate technological advancement. People will adopt new technology once they have access to cleaner energy so they can understand it better. For instance, the development of durable electricity generators for wind farms requires a large number of scientists, who can significantly advance technology. In contrast, if people only pay attention to conventional energy sources, they will in some ways hinder the advancement of related technology since they will only pay attention to how to use the energy sources rather than how to create novel approaches to discover new energy sources. A country or business might suffer greatly from a lack of innovative technology in this rapidly evolving environment.
Finally, some people will continue to have the belief that traditional energy sources are more affordable to use and may result in economic rewards. However, I wish to point out that conventional energy sources cannot be recycled and are not reusable. We shall observe that as oil and coal are used, their quantities are rapidly decreasing and will soon reach nothing. Due to their absence, the traditional will cost more in this turn.
In conclusion, there are various domains in which energy use is present around the world, making it a difficult issue for many to consider. However, I continue to think that in the twenty-first century, we should put more of an emphasis on new, cleaner forms of energy because they are better for the environment and for people like us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ner forms of energy. For three reasons, Ill go into further detail about my points....
^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'goes'.
Suggestion: goes
...forms of energy. For three reasons, Ill go into further detail about my points. ...
^^
Line 6, column 182, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...leaner energy so they can understand it better. For instance, the development of durab...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...city generators for wind farms requires a large number of scientists, who can significantly advan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.484375 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94325677043 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1549706767 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.842105263 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311658543304 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906255781584 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088375179388 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180209754249 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044096544139 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.