The ability to communicate with others is always concerned by many individuals, some people believe that students in college need more practice for speaking and they prefer to let students take public speaking courses. Nevertheless, I think universities don’t need to add an additional requirement that students need to take public speaking courses. I will elaborate on my illustration for three reasons.
First of all, the environment in colleges already gives students an atmosphere for practicing to public speaking. A standard university has a lot of departments in it and definitely provides students with stages to communicate, and eventually, their communication will develop into spellbinding speaking to the public. For instance, the architecture department in a college usually has many seminars for students to put out their opinion on issues about society or publicity. The topic of them involves many aspects of the public lives such as how to design a comprehensive building for public. During discussions, students will eventually enhance their speaking skills in public. However, when universities need students to submit a registration for public speaking courses, students will have less communication in their majors.
Secondly, the public speaking class for every student will occupy a lot of resources of universities, both in financial and academy. A university always has a large number of students, letting them take speech lessons will be a frustrating thing for the financial department of the university. On the other hand, the school needs to prepare a sophisticated schedule for students, which is a total waste of many for students and staff’s time. Some students need to have a lot of time to practice such as taking a volunteer activity or being an intern in a company in their major. Taking a public speech class will disrupt their plan.
Finally, some people may give an illustration that a requirement for students’ public speaking courses can give students more chances in career development. Unfortunately, the result of classes may have somewhat benefits but they can not make students more confidence in future job finding or business practicing. A successful person in a career field needs to be evaluated by many divisions, and the skill of expression in public is just a single aspect of judgments of a person. The employer needs to concern more about a person and give a fair statement. Just focusing on how to describe an issue well is not enough for career enhancement in future life.
In conclusion, a proposal for some teaching agenda needs a lot of discussion and conversation in society and it is a very complex issue to give the best choice. However, I believe that a public talking class is unnecessary for students, universities, and society. The resources need to be tapped into truly important fields.
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 71
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses Give specific examples and details to support your answer 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: ADD_AN_ADDITIONAL[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'add a requirement'.
Suggestion: add a requirement
...ess, I think universities don’t need to add an additional requirement that students need to take public speak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve less communication in their majors. Secondly, the public speaking class for ...
^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...al and academy. A university always has a large number of students, letting them take speech less...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25434782609 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06279275056 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471739130435 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 758.7 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1669447468 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.863636364 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199486234026 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727023263556 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592438196473 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125701004332 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526466486173 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: ADD_AN_ADDITIONAL[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'add a requirement'.
Suggestion: add a requirement
...ess, I think universities don’t need to add an additional requirement that students need to take public speak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve less communication in their majors. Secondly, the public speaking class for ...
^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...al and academy. A university always has a large number of students, letting them take speech less...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2417.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25434782609 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06279275056 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471739130435 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 758.7 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1669447468 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.863636364 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199486234026 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727023263556 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592438196473 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125701004332 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526466486173 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.