Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past can help us better understand the present. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that some citizens of our society claim that the history of Earth and their nation is not important for them; however, another part of the population has a different point of view. It is true that people think a lot about their future but not give attention to their past. Nevertheless, it is essential to know the history of the world, your country, and your community because it would be better to avoid the common mistakes of your ancestors.
Indeed, our history is a circle of the events which happens with all generations in the past, such as wars, segregation, and xenophobia. On the one hand, it would be unwise to suppose that we didn’t have the same problems and issues in our history that we have now. On the other hand, you can’t find the situation with the same conditions because you could not ignore changes in our current life, government, and judicial system.
Clearly, history as a subject at schools and universities is a mandatory syllabus for all students, and mostly it is concern countries where pupils could choose their lessons each year. To some people learning history is a tedious task of memorizing long lists of names and dates which they never will use in the future. While to other people, historical books, events are thought-provoking and engrossing for them, providing many thoughts and actions.
A stick example of our history's significance is mistakes that politics and heads of nations make many times. For instance, in the United States, Donald Trump, the former president, did not appreciate history and promulgated laws against legal and illegal immigrants. After years of this policy, the Congress, Senate, and the nation observe all dire problems and limitations of this policy literally and figuratively. The agriculture sector noticed that they didn't have a cheap workforce from Latin America; companies from the IT area couldn't afford engineers and high-tech specialists from East Europe. It is only one example when every principal should read history and check facts before making a decision.
Overall, our and the next generation should think about all rooms and opportunities for our population, exceptionally with a foundation of history and the previous events' value. It is said to see that people have been learning history but are still repeating the same mistakes: waging wars, committing injustice, and "reinventing the wheel."
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 73
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyments doing things they like to do rather than things they should 80
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 78
- The reading states that robustus was a scavenger However the lecturer claims that R robustus was a successful predator because of the three following reasons 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'use'.
Suggestion: will never use
...ong lists of names and dates which they never will use in the future. While to other people, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he agriculture sector noticed that they didnt have a cheap workforce from Latin Ameri...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 523, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...orce from Latin America; companies from the IT area couldnt afford engineers and high-...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 535, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...tin America; companies from the IT area couldnt afford engineers and high-tech speciali...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for instance, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80116130859 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3621371942 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140234132443 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438801819443 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324595529204 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767979531004 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274983917666 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.