Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
There have been several disputed discussions on whether land should be used for human needs or animals. As for everything, there are always two sides to every question. Personally, I believe that we should respect the environment, and should incorporate the rules and regulations related to saving the environment. I feel this for two reasons, which I explore in the following essay.
First of all, Saving the environment will protect us from Manmade diseases; Moreover, it will also help to curb the different types of pollution such as air pollution, water pollution, etc. My personal experience is a compelling example of this; About two months ago, I faced a problem which affects my eyes as well as skin; I went to a doctor and found that my body was affected by Ultra-violet rays and the reason for such rays was depletion of ozone layer and reason for depletion of ozone layer is Air pollution. Therefore, humans should invest for the future and save the earth beauty by protecting the environment.
Secondly, Saving the land for endangered animals is important for life-cycle; Life cycle will be disturbed if humans use the land for their self-esteem; Moreover, if preventive action is not taken, It will spoil the lives of mass animals as well as mass humans. let us look at the instance of New Delhi, Capital of India; As per the WHO report issued on 20 November 2019, New Delhi ranked one of the most polluted Cities; a report is also stated that if the conditions remain the same for the next five years, the life of Delhi people will be decreased drastically and it affects the life cycle. The reason for such a situation is the human itself. Humans made a life for animals exacerbate. Therefore, Regulatory Authorities should take necessary actions; otherwise, it will turn out to be a humanmade disaster that will affect the whole earth.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that People should promote land saving Projects rather than activities related to the promotion of industrialization. This is because Saving life is more important than earning money, and because the future is ours; thus, it is the duty of every human to take steps so that our future can live better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- internet is good or bad 73
- Young people enjoy life more than old people do 70
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and details to support your response 60
- The extended family( grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Let
...of mass animals as well as mass humans. let us look at the instance of New Delhi, C...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89866666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74116731015 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541333333333 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1368768823 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.214285714 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229621778632 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895486813215 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566868378387 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138530670914 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200593181733 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.