Some people think that a regular language test helps children to improve their knowledge
Language tests are an excruciatingly unpleasant thing for most of the children. However, some people think that they can improve children’s knowledge. In my way of thinking, they actually can enhance the proficiency of any child. In this essay, I will explain why with proper examples and arguments.
First of all, tests generally help children to better understand their strengths and weaknesses. Assessments developed by teachers or professionals allow students to demonstrate these intelligences in order to be provided with the immediate feedback on the subjects they require further comprehension on. Frequent testing can play a crucial role in discovering all the unclear matter and allows them to keep tabs on what they know and what they still need to learn.
Secondly, tests can produce better recall of facts, a deeper and more complex understanding of them. Students could not possibly remember everything they encounter, given that our memory is necessarily selective and continually sieved. By knowing that the likelihood of the event, in which the learnt information will be useful in the future during the test, is high, our brains unconsciously mark that information as an important thing, thus, making it less forgettable and easier to recall.
In conclusion, I think that taking language tests undoubtedly improves children's knowledge by showing them all their flaws and psychological factor plays a huge role as well.
- Some people think that certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 60
- Some people think that you can not get a good education in a foreign country 88
- Some people think that childhood is the best period in a person s life 80
- Some people think that there must be fixed punishment for all types of crimes Do you agree disagree 60
- Some people think that excess lessons help children to improve their knowledge 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...now and what they still need to learn. Secondly, tests can produce better recal...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 225.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40888888889 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0251750281 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684444444444 0.524837075471 130% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6205633171 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.636363636 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279213169657 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106039086459 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127360966936 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175614930687 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108506867507 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.