Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong. Compare these two attitudes. Which attitude do you agree with? Support your choice with specific examples.
Today there is no shortage of debate that people are able to rely on first impression about someone. And there is a large number of supporters of this idea. But on the other hand there is an opinion that first impression is usually wrong, because there are a lot of situations which can influence on person and change his behavior. Moreover, I totally agree with this and I feel this way for some reasons.
First of all, people tend to be nervous and shy when they see someone at the first time. It is common knowledge that a lot of people who do not really confident in themselves are able to become reserved. Also, this can lead to changes in their behavior, so conversation with this sort of people will be quite unpleasant or factitious. According to my best friend experience, she used to be shy and close person with lack of confidence. So, when we met at the first time, she seemed me inhospitable and her emotions were a little bit artificial. And it was my first impression about her. But now I have known her better and I have comprehended that she is a really good person with her own personality.
Secondly, if people try to make a great impression on somebody, there will be a high probability that they alter their manners. It is a well-known fact that people always try to seem better than they are. And for this reason, their demeanor can be a little bit weird or specific for other people. According to my personal experience, when I moved to the another city, I tried to make new friends. Furthermore, I wanted to show my best qualities to them. But unfortunately, they told me that my behavior was quite odd, because I joked everywhere even if situation was extremely serious. And this example provides the evidence that first impression is not always true.
By the way of conclusion, based on arguments explored above, it goes without say that first image about a person is not trustful. And people should know someone better before they will make their conclusion about this person.
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently, while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 66
- Some companies decided to not permit employees to reply the e-mail or text assciated with the work in the holliday or on weekends. Some people think that this policy will improve satisfaction of employees. While other argue that policy. What do you think? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Childhood is the happiest time of person life 60
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement the government should support scientist research even if there is no practical use. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the point made in the article 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... impression about someone. And there is a large number of supporters of this idea. But on the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...me inhospitable and her emotions were a little bit artificial. And it was my first impress...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...or this reason, their demeanor can be a little bit weird or specific for other people. Acc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, i feel, sort of, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62745098039 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63743303411 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518207282913 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6128649427 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.85 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28258272288 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874628239572 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064131227715 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189257764937 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171663190953 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.