Some students enjoy taking distance-learning courses on the computer or television. Other students would rather take all of their courses with a teacher in a classroom. Which of these options do you think is better?
As the high-tech electronics spawn in this information era, the new pattern of study has emerged simultaneously. Some students switched to take distance-learning courses on high-tech devices, while others persist in taking courses with teachers in classrooms. Frankly speaking, I’d like to take part in face-to-face classes with teachers in classrooms for persuasive explanations.
To begin with, face-to-face courses provides students with opportunities to ask questions and consult problems about assignment on time. As the common belief suggests, the vital part of study is dealing with problems, anyone couldn’t reach progress in study as long as they oversee problems. While delaying problems in study is inevitable during distance-learning courses, especially taking recorded courses without any contact between teachers and students, in that case students have to delay their problems, and might put those problems out of their minds in a long term. My little brother is a typical example, during the serious pandemic period of Covid-19, his school established distance-learning courses to keep their pace of studying. However, his mathematics teacher always played recorded videos on class and delayed to reply students’ messages, from them on my brother never ask any questions on has mathematics teacher, and got a failing grade the distance-learning cumulative final without doubt.
To some extent, distance-learning courses still present some unforeseen problems might interfere the overall process of teaching. Like network interruption, delay, error connecting, all those technical problems are unpredictable with far-reaching impact. Specifically speaking, no one can guarantee the distance-learning courses could always going well as a great many students taking the same courses, not mention to some deprived students with inferior devices. There’s a professional study by research group indicates the fact that with the exited high-tech sources, problems like network interruption couldn’t be wiped out, especially under considerable pressure when massive people stayed online.
Nevertheless, I’m no saying that taking distance-learning courses are solely wrong, instead there’s indeed a favourable trait that it’s quite convenient. Without spending time on commuting, students possess more time to study and teachers gain a better balance between life and working. However, taking distance-learning courses comes to be unfavourable as long as considering the possibilities of delaying, ignoring problems in study and the potential technical problems that interrupt classes.
In a nutshell, with the notions I mentioned above, there’s every reason to believe that taking courses with teachers in classrooms is more appropriate by all means.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 820, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'delayed replying'.
Suggestion: delayed replying
...ays played recorded videos on class and delayed to reply students’ messages, from them on my bro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
... distance-learning courses could always going well as a great many students taking th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
frankly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9525 4.8611393121 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29210324109 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8226769257 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8125 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380281532438 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136371307459 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103651455081 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239861095786 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371106477791 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 11.7677419355 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 10.9000537634 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.