Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days more and more classes based on the discussion are creating in the universities and colleges. In my opinion, if I forced to choose from these points, I would definitely prefer the former one. I feel this way or two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, discussing what you have learned with others help you to deeply understand that subject because most of the people usually benefit from practices than theories. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. When I was in a college, I couldn’t understand enough about the marine biology lecture the professor mainly talk. Since there were a lot of students were gossiping, so there was no chance to focus on the professor’s lecture. As a result, I failed on this subject twice and had no idea how to resolve this problem. However, I discussed it about my professor and he suggested me to try his private review class. Initially, the atmosphere was completely different from college lecture because there was almost no lecture but a great number of conversations. After two months I enrolled in this class, I found myself got better than the past and I surprisingly decided to do my thesis in this subject.
Secondly, talks are mostly concentrated on the professor means you will be limited by only the professor’s opinions on this matter. Nonetheless, if the classes are based on dialogue with their classmates and the professor, there will more new ideas and information from a lot of students who come from completely different social backgrounds. Also, it makes the class more enjoyable and more accessible than ever before. Drawing from my cousin’s experience, he found his same interested mate from his class in which allowed students to exchange their ideas with each other. Interestingly, they have conducted some great scientific research together and today they still motivate each other as their bright ideas and enthusiasms. Without this great allowance, he couldn’t find his life-long friend from this place.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the classes which include mainly discussions are far better than those consist of primarily lectures this is because it helps students to grasp the main ideas more quickly and because it gives them opportunities to listen to their like-minded peers and get invaluable information from them.
- TPO16Q1 80
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. 83
- The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.First of all, the articles cl 80
- Every year forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affecte 89
- TPO-3: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings att 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13316582915 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9378553686 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560301507538 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.116541104 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224114828792 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649208429152 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430287795347 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125185559064 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388546727464 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.