Sometimes you are required to meet with another person to provide feedback about that person's work (for example, when you must give your opinions about a classmate's work on an assignment or your thoughts about a coworker's contribution to a project). When you have both positive and negative feedback to give about a person's work, do you believe it is more effective to give the positive comments first or the negative comments first? Why?
People have different views on whether we should give our positive feedback or negative first. In my opinion, I believe that people have to give others positive comments first since people care about their reputations, feelings, and acceptance of the comments.
First of all, people place emphasis on their reputations, if people give them some negative comments first, they would probably damage their reputations. Take me as an example. When I was an employee in a global company, my coworkers wanted me to give him some comments on his projects. Although his projects had many flaws, I still gave him some positive comments first. My coworker felt pretty comfortable and thankful for my extraordinary comments and also look after his reputation. However, if I gave him the negative comments in advance, he would feel I was very offensive and ruined his reputation.
Secondly, people focus on others' feelings, and if we give people positive comments first, they would like to listen to the following comments. My brother's experience is a compelling example to illustrate this idea. He had to work with his classmates on a side project when he was in university. To be more specific, he had to organize everyone's comments and delivered the comments to every teammate. However, there were many negative comments, but my brother know it was important for others' feelings. As a result, he said some good comments first to appraise, and then said the negative comments secondly to make people have good feelings.
Last but not least, nowadays people want others to take their advice, and if people give them positive comments in advance, their suggestions would have more chance to be taken. For instance, my friend, David, was very rude and no one wanted to listen to his comments. That is to say, he always firstly gave people many negative comments, and provided few positive comments at the end. Hence, his suggestions were seldom taken by his coworkers. Apparently, if he could give his coworkers some good comments at first and then offer a few negative comments in the following discussion, his advice might always be taken by his coworkers.
In conclusion, people still have many opinions on this topic. However, in the above essay, I fully support my reasons and contend my arguments. After all, people should give positive comments first because people care about others' reputations, feelings, and acceptance of the comments.
- TPO 38 60
- TPO 51 Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some people are too obsessed with buying or acquiring material things expensive clothes and cars because they think people around them will judge them by what they posess 70
- TPO 45 70
- TPO 53 3
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, after all, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10224438903 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69648371661 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438902743142 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5099977457 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841827315228 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339064891811 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038543266199 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602571282139 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177055527503 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, after all, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10224438903 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69648371661 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438902743142 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5099977457 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841827315228 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339064891811 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038543266199 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602571282139 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177055527503 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.