The world has witnessed a considerable change; new technology replaced old clumsy tools, and the economy develops at a speed beyond the average person’s imagination. Nowadays, most people no longer need to be concerned about basic expenses like food or clothes and increasingly pay attention to the education of their children. The debate over whether children should receive weekly spending money from their parents is still fierce. Some suggest that this practice would cause students to abuse this money and cannot help them develop a correct conception of money organization. However, I hold this view differently. I believe that it is positive to give their children weekly spending money.
To begin with, giving children weekly spending money actually help them build up a consciousness of how to spend money rationally, and children aged five to eight are in the golden time to cultivate some quality. Children, isolated in their ivory towers, do not understand the mechanism of the real world. Money, desired by countless people, can serve as a key to providing them with a comprehensive and objective understanding of the real world. By using this weekly spending money, children would understand the regret and helplessness after compulsive shopping and how to accumulate money in order to buy an expensive item, contributing to their development of organizing money, all of which expand their knowledge and broaden their horizons. According to a cohort study conducted by Harvard University, in which they followed two hundred children aged from five to eight years old for fifteen years, the study showed that children who have their own spending money in childhood are more likely to be described as competent by their parents and perform well in money organization than those who do not have.
Admittedly, letting younger children have spending money may have some potential problems. They may easily be attracted by advertisements of junk food on television or social media, which would have an adverse effect on their physical health. They also may use this money to charge for online games or other entertainment since they lack self-control. However, their parents can easily deal with the situations mentioned above. They can ask their children to make a budget or a plan where they want to use money, and their parents can check this budget to supervise their children. Moreover, many games have child lock now, which can be used by parents to prevent their children from abusing money.
In a nutshell, giving children weekly spending money is undoubtedly a wiser choice for the reasons discussed above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22695035461 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7529994911 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548463356974 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6443498378 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472431741547 0.236089414692 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164556904176 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108229705363 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307421997047 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340171892314 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.