Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?
Accompanied with/Coupled with the coming of the information era, people began to realize that knowledge is the primary productive force. From then on, an increasing attention has been put on education spontaneously. With this phenomenon, a controversy has emerged: weather(whether) younger students ought to be taught by different teachers? In my perspective, I tend to agree with（或side with） the idea by supporting several theories.
In the first place, as well as the formative students, younger students also need to build up solid and wide-scope foundation of knowledge. To be specific, with the keen aspiration of cultivating generalists, emphasizes(emphasize为动词, emphasis为名词) are supposed to be laid upon primary education as well as secondary education. It's acknowledged that children between 6 to 12 years old possess the best absorbing and utilizing capabilities. Realizing this, in order to get advantage of this characteristic, allocating different teachers of different subjects render pupils to set up solid foundation of knowledge in a competitively earlier age. And when I say this, I'm not denying that the only one teacher couldn't teach different teachers(subjects?), the one indeed is capable of managing all subjects. But comparing to those teachers who specialize in respective fields with solid specialized knowledge and teaching skills, allocating only one teacher seems not advisable anymore. Besides, this respective（啥意思？） is supported by a relevant experiment: as two given groups of pupils with similar IQ are taught by two kinds of patterns, one is only one teacher taught all subjects and the other is allocating specific teachers in different subjects. And the results are exposed by the final exam: the general grades of all subjects of the group which are taught by only one teacher are dramatically lower that another group's. That is to say, diverse classes of different teachers promote younger students to grasp knowledge better than being taught by only one teacher.
Equally significant, diverse teaching style of different teachers encourage younger students to focus more on classes. In a sense, being taught by only one teacher is so boring that students are likely to be distracted by other things, especially those younger students with weaker sense of learning. Along with more and more occurrences of distraction among students, the guarantee of mastering knowledge for students are damaged and the efficiency of classes declines. What is worse, forcing only one teacher to teach all subjects imposed too much workloads on shoulders of teachers, saying that teachers not only need to undertake different subjects for whole day, but also have to prepare a great many classes by squeezing their spare time. If anyway, tremendous workloads will bring about considerable stress to teachers, and destroy their bodies and minds, not mention to the less guarantee of teaching quality of every class, as well as damage the effectivity and efficiency of classes. That reminds me of one of my teachers in primary school, Jessi undertook two subjects: Literacy and English. In order to manage the two subjects well, she had to seize and squeeze to prepare her classes outside of class. After 3 months, she resigned to deal with her worse and worse body conditioning due to the heavy workloads. Besides, frankly speaking, I didn't learn English really well during that period.
In a nutshell, I totally agree with the idea that younger students are supposed to be taught by different teachers for two reasons: students are promoted to grasp knowledge better and are encouraged to focus on classes.
- whether students should learn economic courses in senior high school 73
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently, while others liketo do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 60
- A government spend money on all adults after 25 year old on a training course for the most up to date skills at workplace Do you think it is effective Why or why not 76
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school which way can bring them the most benefit Accumulating work experience by taking a part time job or volunteering in a community Learning to play a sport Learning to play a musical instr 73
- The only reason for people working hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ively earlier age. And when I say this, Im not denying that the only one teacher c...
^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...m not denying that the only one teacher couldnt teach different teacherssubjects?, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...an being taught by only one teacher. Equally significant, diverse teaching style of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...acher to teach all subjects imposed too much workloads on shoulders of teachers, say...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...workloads. Besides, frankly speaking, I didnt learn English really well during that p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, besides, but, first, frankly, if, really, second, so, then, well, as well as, in the first place, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 52.1666666667 190% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3091.0 1977.66487455 156% => OK
No of words: 571.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41330998249 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28763758442 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495621716287 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 936.0 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5337445444 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.391304348 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8260869565 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487706285987 0.236089414692 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146518175689 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135337885373 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327432089137 0.150856017488 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733980257703 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.