Task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
communication skills and etiquette are the most important pillars of society and humanity in today's world. As we live in a chaotic age which needs more adaption towards the events, one simplest feature that can help us is friendship and helping other people. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether people should connect in person to produce better work or whether they should use non-face-to-face ways like using email instead. Some people possess the conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege the former is more fruitful. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Although using new devices and technology makes life easier and more auspicious, the experience of getting involved in certain projects is more gregarious. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraph represents a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is connecting with people brings us a situation that we can learn many things about it. We almost prefer to keep our privacy and refuse to join a group easily. By connecting and talking with people as a team or group we can enhance and boost some soft skills like patience and malleability. For example, we can speculate about other team members' abilities and be good friends with each other.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that connection with the people in the team, can increase the performance of the team. When all team members endeavor they can get a better result instead of playing individually. The team doesn't need the team leader to steer them. They can find their path by own self. Consider my personal experience to make this point clear. In my current role, as a programmer, I have a boss who is very strict and has vigor rules. He prefers the team to follow his mannerisms and one of them is don't talk about our personal lives to each other at work. This trait makes us feel uncomfortable about our meetings and reporting. As a consequence, the performance of the team decreases. One of my coworkers felt depressed in this situation and left the firm.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that people should connect with each other as a team to improve team performance.
- Underwater whales produce loud noises known as songs Scientists use whale songs to study the movements for migrations of groups of whales Recently scientists discovered something unusual a single solitary whale whose song is unlike that of all other known 60
- Accessing the internet and using such facilities make our life easier in today s world We can access a lot of information just by simply clicking A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether governments offer Internet acce 90
- visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 71
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communication
communication skills and etiquette are the most impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n increase the performance of the team. When all team members endeavor they can get ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...stead of playing individually. The team doesnt need the team leader to steer them. The...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ollow his mannerisms and one of them is dont talk about our personal lives to each o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96231155779 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77695485118 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560301507538 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8814377444 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7727272727 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144493463904 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384191665873 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385000715194 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872352886203 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168047103982 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communication
communication skills and etiquette are the most impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n increase the performance of the team. When all team members endeavor they can get ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...stead of playing individually. The team doesnt need the team leader to steer them. The...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ollow his mannerisms and one of them is dont talk about our personal lives to each o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96231155779 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77695485118 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560301507538 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8814377444 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7727272727 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144493463904 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384191665873 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385000715194 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872352886203 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168047103982 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.