technology has made children less creative
Undoubtedly, modern children are very different in many aspects from who lived in a few decades ago. Indeed, modern technological advancements play a significant role in their creativity. While a large number of people believe that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past, others believe the obverse idea. Nevertheless, in my point of view, although technology has resulted in many advantages for children, it also has brought a number of disadvantages.
Modern games that are resulted from technology have made children more creative. It is obvious that games have tremendous impacts on both children and adults. Games foster the mind, learn people to compromise, and lead them to think, and thinking is the major factor that results in creativity. In the past, children played with other children and they played with simple objects. There was not diversity in their games, and it caused them to not think deeply. On the other hand, nowadays, most children play with computers rather than other children, and the number of games that are produced for children has become more and more. The wide variety of games causes children to think more; because, games are more complex and they should think rationally and use different strategies. Therefore, current children encounter with more complex games in comparison with who lived past, and it makes them be more creative.
In spite of what mentioned before, it is not debatable that technology has made children more isolated, and it has negative influences on the creativity of children. In the past, children did not have many game facilities, they used limited material for play, and they usually played out of home. For example, a group of children used the clay in beaches to construct buildings and other structures. Therefore, they were active, and they spent much time with other children. It is obvious that being active and sharing ideas helped them to be creative. However, modern technological advancements have provided everything for children in their own rooms. It causes children to not require going out, contacting with other children, and using their hands to create objects. When they do not experience in real world, their imagination would not be expanded; then, they would be less creative than past children.
In recapitulation, it depends on children to utilize the positive results of modern technological advancements or suffer from its negative consequences. However, it is the duty of parents to guide their children to become creative. They should provide useful games for their children to use their minds in a proper way. Furthermore, they should not let the technology make their children isolated, and they should let their children to experience and contact with other children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- tpo 49 3
- TPO test30 burning mirror 77
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ificant role in their creativity. While a large number of people believe that technology has made...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...nd adults. Games foster the mind, learn people to compromise, and lead them to think, ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s for their children to use their minds in a proper way. Furthermore, they should not let the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73869032411 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435555555556 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4598042029 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356551800024 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1215444001 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1038313836 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263127018226 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780509944562 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.