Technology has made children less creative than the past
There was a time men had made technology possible and now is the time when it looks almost as if technology can make a man. Our extreme dependency on technological advancements has led us with advantages and diadvantages alike. While they have come to ease us with convenience, comfort and luxury, diminishing level of creativity has indeed been a price to pay, especially among the children, the younger generation. Not only has its dependency made the life easy but it has also made people lazy, children even more.
A very classic illustraition on how technology has corrupted the children of this generation is in the trend of how problem solving attitude has changed among them. For instance: when provided with an assignment to write an essay on importance of something as common as water, the first instinct of these kids is to open their gadgets and google "Importance of water". Despite having countless examples to explain in the essay through self reflection on day to day chores, they find it instinctively right to look for ready made answers. The availability of information in such kind no longer compels the children to think or anlayse by themselves and it has thus lead to reduction in utilization of their creativity. Same goes with almost every kind of problem solving attitude.
Another instinctive attitude children have developed ever since the technolgical development is the habit of looking for shortcuts or easy way outs. For example, when my younger brother is hungry, he finds it far more convenient to order food online and have it delivered in home rather than going through all the process of cooking food. The phone in his hand no longer sends him in kitchen to look for ingredients, get the correct amount, heat to right temperature or serve the dish in fanciful manners. Even though it easy to have food delivered, it is equally important for him to learn something as basic as cooking which is also quite a creative art in itself. Creativity is dead as phone brigns meals in houses.
As much as the culprit to finding shortcuts is designated as the technology, the fact that the kids are in fact exploring and finding ways for easy way out is not complete death of creativity yet. The more children have interacted with these advancements, the more they've learnt ways to adpat and adopt them in ways people of higher age find it quite difficut. It is in this aspect that the technology is still promoting creativity to some extent. However, this can righfully be attributed to the age of the people as children tend to learn faster and be more creative than older people. A child can find its way around an Uber service app faster than their grandparents. Hence, it can't be implied directly to the technology for higher creativity among children.
Hence, the advancements in technology have provided with shortcuts, accesibility and convenience to information and services that have led to development of habit and attitude among children of present generation in such a way that their creativity is by default sharply decreasing. It is in this regard creativity has been robbed off from children due to technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
... day chores, they find it instinctively right to look for ready made answers. The ava...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...r anlayse by themselves and it has thus lead to reduction in utilization of their cr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... out is not complete death of creativity yet. The more children have interacted w...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...acted with these advancements, the more theyve learnt ways to adpat and adopt them in ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 684, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ster than their grandparents. Hence, it cant be implied directly to the technology f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 684, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ster than their grandparents. Hence, it cant be implied directly to the technology f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9530956848 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87937549378 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500938086304 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.215000507 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2272727273 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25943813062 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811615983931 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590615798973 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153315542512 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646120843452 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.