Telephones and email have made communication between people less personal. Do you agree or not with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
There was a time when people had to wait months and even years to communicate with each other across the globe. Then telephone and e-mails arrived in our life which made communication so easy and fast that it feels like we are living in a small word. However, the statement in the questions calls upon the privacy that we feel while communicating through telephones and e-mails. If I am to give my opinion on it, I think that telephones and emails has not made our communication any less personal. I believe this for following reasons.
The first reason is that they can be used as the most reliable form of communication if we have to transfer our message to specific person. Let’s say if we had to send our private message to any specific person through letter or any other handy form of communication, will it be as secret as possible? Would not any one through the way open it and read it? We never know for that. For instance, in my own personnel life, I use telephones or emails if I had to send any private message to any person. There is no fear that anyone other than the desired person will be listening to our telephone chat or even reading that email. It is really safe for sending private messages. If this was not the case why office messages and applications are sent through the emails or even by telephone calls? I think we can assume by these facts that why the telephones and emails can be reliable form of communication.
On the other hand, while we use letters for communication, it can hamper our private life and even bring some problems. To explain that: it was just a year ago, when my neighbor had some important paper delivered through post box, he ended up having a big problem. My neighbor had to go through court offices as paper was really important house documents and it was lost. He was so afraid that if any other person would get it and misuse it. Although he solved this problem, but if he had used emails instead of post office service, he really would not face this problem at all.
All in all, as efficient and fast as the telephones and emails are, they are very safe to use and are being used as the reliable form of communications. However, some might use letters and other communications by doubting if these communication ways can make their communication less personnel, I really want to suggest them to consider the above reasons. So in conclusion, I feel that telephones and emails do not make our communications less personal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-13 | Nikee Shrestha | 70 | view |
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think that this is a good idea? Suppose your opinions by using specific details and examples. 70
- Telephones and email have made communication between people less personal. Do you agree or not with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- People think it is good to do jobs while studying. Do you think good to do jobs in students life? Explain with specific examples. 70
- when people need to complain about a product or any service, someprefer to complain in mail and other prefer to complain in person.which do you prefer. give reasons and details. 70
- People enjoy the most in his life during his young days than his old days. Do you agree with the statement? If yes state with examples and if no state with examples. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
... it be as secret as possible? Would not any one through the way open it and read it? We...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, then, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57399103139 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68699686278 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461883408072 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3379750606 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7272727273 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220493463902 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712115472334 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701389340527 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155914436216 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866340442391 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.