Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
It is evident that advertisements are created to be intriguing for their targeted audiences. In my view, such advertisements have more detrimental impact on children than adults. I will elaborate on my reasons through the following paragraphs.
To begin with, advertisements, most often, portray only the positive aspects of products and intentionally hide the downsides, creating a false superiority of its quality. Adults may be able to see through the fallacies in the advertisements and decide on their choices. However, children do not know what is better for them and this eventually might create an obsessive desire to buy whatever is shown on the commercials.
Additionally, even adults sometimes find it hard to control the tempting commercials of products, let alone children. Companies can easily catch children’s interests with bright colors, lively commercials, and unnecessary new upgrades. For example, fast food chains lure their children customers by offering limited edition toys with their kids-meal. I, personally, have been a victim of such advertisements when I was a child. I used to beg my mother to buy the set-meal every time they renewed their selection of toys. Likewise, when exposed to such commercials, children tend to lose control and insist their parents to buy those unnecessary products.
Furthermore, advertisements can cause a sense of inferiority or stress on children’s minds. Commercials for kid’s toys, in particular, are produced in such a way that often portray a message that it is “cool” to have the newest toys and upgraded gadgets. For those children who are not able to buy those products might feel interpret these commercials in a wrong way and get disheartened.
In a nutshell, I maintain that advertisements are more harmful for children and they should not be allowed to be aired on television. On top of this, parents should take a notice on any of such commercials that their children are exposed to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... might feel interpret these commercials in a wrong way and get disheartened. In a nutshell...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, likewise, may, so, for example, in particular, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32165605096 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19290824633 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8488696151 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2941176471 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17205831332 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621079210555 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066611864004 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115399544472 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734009908069 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.