Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Television advertising is one of the most effective ways of convincing people to buy a product, or avail a service. Even the most strong-willed melt in the face of a finely built advertisement. Directing this strategy to children, who are by nature stubborn and sensitive at this young age, is not a wise option in my opinion.
Characters of children are shaped in the tender age of two to five. They like exploring new things and experiences. And advertisements are the tools for just that. And when kids ask for articles they saw on the advertisements, parents are generally unable to decline these requests. So they end up giving in to the whims of a two year old. And if they did deny, juveniles tend to throw tantrums. Either way, it affects the mentality of children.
Children who are given all they want, despite being unnecessary, tend to grow up spoilt. These kids will not assess the utter necessity of an item before buying it, they may indulge in spontaneous extravanganza. On the other hand, children who are denied every wish of theirs( because their parents deemed it unnecessary), tend to develop an animosity toward parents. This feeling is rooted in the idea that their parents do no give in to their wishes. Such kids tend to act out on every occasion.
Advertisements do not have a positive impact on young kids, either way. It is in the best interests of children and the process of moulding their characters that advertisements not be directed at them. Every product pertaining to children must be scrutinised by parents first. Though some may argue that reaching out to children directly can help them decide independently and have their own choices, but independence of thought is not a characteristic that be necessarily present in children of ages two to five.
Considering the aforementioned reasons, I hold my ground that television advertisements should not be directed at children of ages two to five.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Andres01 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9237804878 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01817411691 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564024390244 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1542946082 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379307310073 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100945548369 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120535192483 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235874469421 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151472269229 0.0645574589148 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.