there will be fewer car in using
Nowadays, one of the most ordinary way to commute, travel and so on is using of personal cars. Recently, there are some heated controversies about institution for cars. The environmentally pollution of cars have discussed very much and also traffic by using a lot cars have made some problems for most people around the world. These two main consequence of using cars lead me to think, using of car among people will be less supported in near future.
In the first place, people knowledges about environmentally hazards caused by pollution of fuel cars, have increased thanks to environmentalists' efforts. There are a lot of television advertisements and congresses in all around the world which are seeking to convince people to use more public transportation instead of their cars. Everyone by looking around can find most people are tending to use their cars less and just in necessary times. For instance, most people in my family, now are more aware of the importance of being care about the environment and future livings. They drive their cars less than previous. For example when they want to travel another city for vacation, each car of them will have four passengers in the opposite of a few time ago with often two passengers. This culture is spreading among the all people over the world which will caused decreasing use of cars.
Second, these most people these days hold hectic life and always are in hurry that these conditions are worsening rapidly. So, they need some more convenient and faster transportation devices in order to handle their tasks more easily. In addition, by thriving new technologies and rapid rate of their progresses, more up-to-date public transportations is introducing to people making them more beforehand to going from one place to another place in a city or country. For example, Tehran city in Iran used to be very bustling with a lot of car in the city, but after the availability of metro through the city from east to west and north to south, the traffic decreased very noticeably. Most people, now find it is more time saving and economical for them to use public transportation rather than their cars. Most governments of big cities are spending a lot of money on public transportations which will be more available in all cities. The engineers all is toiling to make power the public transportations routes to support more commuting of people in each cities. These proceedings will lead to declining the use of cares.
Is summary, in my opinion the culture of environment friendliness among people around the world is increasing; life is changing toward more hectic; and public transportations are prospering more and more. All of these bring word with less using of car.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Rembrandt's painting 73
- whether or not have to correct others mistakes especially ones of their teacher or meeting leaders 73
- the possible sources of strange sounds (so-called quackers) hearing by sailors in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean 76
- declining of population of sea otters 80
- Early birds or night owl 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of cars'.
Suggestion: a lot of cars
...y in Iran used to be very bustling with a lot of car in the city, but after the availability...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96069868996 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87608875055 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473799126638 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9803661465 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.19047619 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251661804117 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935579441309 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978122102142 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188745407701 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902295778627 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.