In times of economic crisis, in which field do you think the government can
cut financial support?
1) Art
2) Scientific research
3) Parks and public gardens
Some people think that when a country faces an economic crisis, the government should cut its financial support on artists. Others disagree and argue that the government should spend less money on scientific research. Still others claim that disbursing less budgets on parks and public gardens is a better option. For me, I maintain that
To begin with, the government should definitely save money when a recession occurs, and cutting down budgets on supporting artists can help the government save a great deal of money. For instance, during the economic crisis in Taiwan in 1990, the Taipei City government stopped wasting 10 million dollars per year supporting young musicians. Similarly, the Kaohsiung City government also decided to not allocate 5% of the total budgets on assisting average artists in finding a job. As a result, both of the governments saved nearly 20% of their total budget. On the contrary, the Taichung City government decided to stop disbursing money on pruning trees in parks and public gardens. Yet, the government only saved 1 million dollars per year, because hiring people to do horticulture is overall not expensive.
In addition, the government must place emphasis on citizen's health, but cutting expenses on scientific research might make many residents become sick. For example, the Taiwanese government stopped spending 200 million dollars on supporting biomedicine research during the pandemic. Although the Taichung City government saved million of dollars, the research and development of domestic Covid-19 vaccine delayed. Consequently, many patients do not have any vaccine to take after they were infected with Covid.
Last but not least, governments have the duty to ensure that residents are living a happy life during the economical recession. Nevertheless, disbursing less money on parks and gardens will definitely make citizens feel unhappy. Take the Hualien County government as an example. Five years ago, the Hualien City government decided to stop aiding Mei-Zhou national park's construction. Also, the government cut down $500,000 on hiring volunteers to clean trash in gardens and parks. Therefore, citizens do not have any place to relax during the weekend, so the suicide rate increased from 0.01% to 0.1%. Two months later, the Hualien County government regretted and chose to reduce the amount of money spent on artists instead. Since most artists are accustomed to live a poor life, the decision did not affect the mental health of most artists. Three month later, the rate dropped from 0.1% back to 0.01%.
In conclusion, I believe that cutting down financial supports on art is the best way for the government to overcome an economical crisis. After all, government must save a great deal of money, focus on the public's health, and make sure that citizens can still live a joyful life during the crisis.
- Company should use public recognition not money to reward hard working 90
- Movies and television programs should present stories of good people being rewarded and bad people being punished Do you agree or disagree with the statement 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work 65
- Experts suggest no more that two hours of screen time per day for children under 13 Do you think this is a good idea 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...pend less money on scientific research. Still others claim that disbursing less budge...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun budgets is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rch. Still others claim that disbursing less budgets on parks and public gardens is ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a better option. For me, I maintain that To begin with, the government should def...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
..., the government must place emphasis on citizens health, but cutting expenses on scienti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ough the Taichung City government saved million of dollars, the research and developmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ents are living a happy life during the economical recession. Nevertheless, disbursing les...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 748, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to living'.
Suggestion: accustomed to living
...artists instead. Since most artists are accustomed to live a poor life, the decision did not affec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...t way for the government to overcome an economical crisis. After all, government must save...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ave a great deal of money, focus on the publics health, and make sure that citizens can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27947598253 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64847791573 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508733624454 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 14.0 3.08781362007 453% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3812156093 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70833333333 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297635434275 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828062757475 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546936262424 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181241856602 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452102429208 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.