Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Education plays an important role in one’s life so as teachers. Teachers build the base of education when we are kids till we end up studying at the university. Some people believe that efforts of teaching students should be valued by paying according to how much the students learn from teachers. However, I definitely believe that it is unfair to pay teachers like that because it will create discrimination among the students in the class, students will lose their opportunity to widen their knowledge from their professors in areas other than the test syllabus, and teachers do not have control selecting the students for their class.
To begin with, if professors or teachers are paid according to students learning, they will be unfair to the students who are below average in their performance. These students need more attention form teachers as it takes more time to learn things for them as compare to other students. If professors are paid according to students’ grade, they will try to focus on bright and average students who can get the high score easily. Thus this will create discrimination among the students, and students who require more help from their teachers will stay behind in their class.
In addition, if teachers are getting money according to students’ score, they will teach them the material which will be on the test. They will not waste their time teaching them about the topics that are not related to the exam. For an instance, when I was in 12th grade in India, we had the board test and I joined the class of the professor to prepare for the test. It was a private institute, the professor was paid on our score. The professor was teaching us only for the topics which are important for the test in that class. I often went to him if I had any questions, and he explained me in details if he was free, but in class he taught us only exam oriented syllabus. This is because he was paid on the students’ grade in the board, and we lost our chance to learn the topic in details. Thus this will narrow down the students’ opportunity to widen their knowledge from their professors.
Last but not least, teachers do not have choice to select the students for his class. The school or college decides the class size and students for his class. If in one class, most of the students are smart, they will get the high score with less efforts. However, if one class is full of mediocre students, over all score for that class will remain low instead of teacher’s great efforts. Thus we cannot decide teachers’ skill according to students learning.
To sum it up, some people think that teachers should be paid according to students’ learning. I totally disagree with that because teachers will differentiate their students according to their intelligence, students will not get chance to broaden their knowledge from their teachers, and teachers do not choose students for their class so their efforts will not be valued properly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Topic: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ents who can get the high score easily. Thus this will create discrimination among t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r chance to learn the topic in details. Thus this will narrow down the students&apos...
^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'class'' or 'class's'?
Suggestion: class'; class's
...lass. The school or college decides the class size and students for his class. If in ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...mart, they will get the high score with less efforts. However, if one class is full ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nstead of teacher's great efforts. Thus we cannot decide teachers' skill a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87134502924 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6820628695 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411306042885 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8181193937 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.652173913 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3043478261 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.34782608696 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246626886288 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910283595097 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736753155137 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180100498252 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729840118834 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.