This topic has been offered at least 2 times in the past 10 months: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor.
(The Preference type, both sides of the issue should be discussed)
No one can cast a shadow of doubt that friends have important roles in everyone's life. Their characteristics and life styles can significantly affect our lives, so by keeping this in mind we can say with utmost confidence that individuals must have too much care in their friends' selecting. One of the most considerable attentions made by people is that their friends must have whether a good sense of humor or smart and clever. As far as I am concerned, intelligence of our friends is a priceless characteristic inasmuch as it cannot compare with sense of humor. Astute friends not only can open a new window into the world for us, but also have an instinct ability to understand our feelings and demands.
In first place, it is not to mention that intelligence is a precious element to see deeply the world which is tied to many dilemmas and tough times. As far as dealing our hectic lives is concerned, we need to broaden our perspective to handle our problems, pass productively our hard time and so on. As we know, most people shared their concerns and problems with their friends. If their friends were unintelligent or stupid, they would receive bad guidance and tips, or even wrong ones. In contrast, if our friends had weak sense of humor, we would maybe have little fun with them, but we will not lose any essential and crucial thing. For such a required, having enjoyment times, we can do various activities like watching a comedy movie, going amusement parks and so for as often as we want.
Secondly, it is crystal clear that any close relationship will continue for a long time only if we be understood in, and friendship is no exception. There are many influential factors like cognitive bias, bad experiences, upbringing condition, to name but a few that can bring misunderstanding in different situations. These factors are with us when we pass time with our friends. Only smart people can eliminate the effect of such misleading elements. Accordingly, when we discuss our emotional feeling, concerns and do forth with them they are more able to understand us. After a short time, they learn us, they know our characters, and even they can give us some new information about our subconscious desires all of which make us comfortable and relax in friendship. Conversely, a friend who has a high sense of humor cannot easily take situations as serious as they are. Most of the time, they make all things fun, even if their friends are sad, they would make jokes. Most of them think that they can get their friends' concerns away by doing a funny job. Psychologically speaking, some worries need to examine meticulously, not take them light. If we forgot our worries by replacing our upsetting moods with happy moods, it would not have a long-term effect.
In summary, with all this taken into account, I firmly believe that as far as a good friendship is concerned, intelligence of our friends is the most important factor must be considered. Smart friends not only are able to understand us, but also can help us on the path to success. Who can in their right mind deny the valuable outcomes of being understood and receiving proper guidance in a friendship?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | SAGm | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | sena | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | eglantine74 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2633.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78727272727 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78461475591 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3318979441 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.32 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194731063517 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655524359318 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520584469601 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141310157971 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523022081758 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.