Topic Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Topic: Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this day and age, there are a number of articles which commonly update worldwide issues including politics, laws, and so on. The criminal press is one of the kinds of topics that attract a great deal of public attention; however, some people argue that it is not necessary to report details of crimes to the public. I totally agree with this opinion because of some rational reasons.
To begin with, reporting details of crime publicly may exert adverse effects on the accelerating criminal rate. This is because anti-social people who are inclined to commit offences will know all the tricks and means to avoid being caught by the police once the detailed report of a heinous offence is revealed. Consequently, things seem to turn out to be much easier to offend a crime. For example, there is a movie called The Social Network which is about hacking. The film describes meticulously how the main character uses apps to attack customers’ private accounts, and how the police tend to react. After the movie’s projection, reports showed that the hacking offence proportion strongly surged.
Secondly, reformed offenders’ mentality will be affected when their cases are published. Several negative comments or reactions are likely to appear whenever there is an article relating to a crime because it is people’s normal reaction to chastise bad behaviours or activities. Nevertheless, those comments did hurt the criminals’ feelings strongly if they read the criticism by any chance. As a result, the offenders may suffer from stress or depression; furthermore, it will be arduous for them to reintegrate once they complete their punishment. A murder case which happened six years ago is a perfect epitome. Woefully, the criminal of this crime was still a juvenile who was not mature enough to confront all the hate from the public; he then suicides since he could not endure his reality.
In conclusion, I totally consent that detailed reports of crime should not be revealed publicly. This is because it probably leads to a high level of crime and the act of publishing will have great influences on offenders’ mentality.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-03 KEVA 76 view
2021-06-03 KEVA 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user KEVA :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77029747432 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621082621083 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4523772236 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.352941176 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202558077347 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609874034215 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791857307802 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134382231762 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625142209929 0.0645574589148 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.