Everyone has their own opinion about education some people like to have a deep knowledge in a specific field by others like to earn a developed ones of different majors. Additionally, different factors also play important role in selecting between these two knowledge earning behaviors.
First, people who want to have their life base on their education should earn a deep knowledge and skillfulness in a specific academic major. For an example people who want to has a good career and suitable social status in the future, should concentrate on a academic subject until be a high level expert so that other problem will be solve. For an example, student should spend their time on only their majors and not different topic because successful in university and learn course good is the most important propriety for them that have a great affect on their future.
Second, Now let's take a look at the other side mean when having developed understanding in many academic topic is better and more useful. In this case we can mention people who don't select academic subjects for career or social successful or even money. Some people has free job without needing to specific knowledge they prefer to developed you're knowledge in many field to personality development.
Third, some people like to earn great scientific honor and discover or invent some new thing or concentrate on a matter to solve an old mystery such as cosmic secrets , genetic coding solving, nano technology and other advanced complex academic subjects should concentrate on that major which Cosmic looking for a solution to its dark point.
As a conclusion, selecting to be a person with a high deep knowledge in a specific academic topic or a person with a developed knowledge in many academic issues depend on that person life situation and goals.
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 40
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 66
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'deep knowledge'.
Suggestion: deep knowledge
...bout education some people like to have a deep knowledge in a specific field by others like to e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... others like to earn a developed ones of different majors. Additionaly different ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 15.1003584229 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 13.8261648746 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.0286738351 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 43.0788530466 5% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 52.1666666667 19% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 240.0 1977.66487455 12% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 45.0 407.700716846 11% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.59002006411 4.48103885553 58% => The fourth root words length is low.
Word Length SD: 2.78088714862 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 38.0 212.727598566 18% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.844444444444 0.524837075471 161% => OK
syllable_count: 81.9 618.680645161 13% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 20.6003584229 10% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086003484843 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608696173136 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374195699698 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086003484843 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 86.8835125448 17% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.