TPO 16 independent the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
Whether traveling in companionship of a tour guide or not is a convoluted controversy and has been a matter of argumentation for a long time. On the one hand, some people believe that traveling alone is better inasmuch as the expenses are minimized as they are visiting everywhere individually, and they do not have to share anything. On the other hand, others claim that following a leader in a tour is more enjoyable owing to the fact that the trip will be memorable and the fun will be in its climax. In my point of view, I am inclined to the latter idea in spite of the fact that the former is more popular and has more aficionados among adults. My answer to this debating bone of contention is twofold, and in the following, the rationale behind it will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.
The first and foremost reason which is worth mentioning is that tour leaders generally have a better insight of the destination; therefore, they are completely aware of intact locations which normally an individual cannot reach by themselves. To put it into a more vivid picture, three years ago, I had a trip to Rasht, one the most beautiful cities in north of Iran. Omitting the challenges of searching for landmarks, I decided to join a group led by one of the best tour leaders of Rasht. Ali, the tour leader, knew everything about the city; he bought us the best brainfreeze of the country in Khomam; then, we had a great time climbing the mountains in the countryside which I counld not even find by myself. Without obeying that seasoned leader, I could not have neither had fun nor seen those strange places.
The second and equally far-reaching explanation to bear in mind is that by following a leader in a trip, a person can easily decrease their expenses insomuch as a professional guide knows all discounts available in the destination's markets; moreover, they have mastered the routes of suburban locations which are reachable cheaply via public transportation. As an illustration, my cousin is a tour guide in Kerman, a city in the southeast of Iran. He knows which shops are on-sale at the end of the year. Additionally, he is exactly aware of the schedule of city buses going to the Lout desert and coming back from it. Thus, following him in an off-road trip into the desert would be more practical, as well as safer, than going alone despite the fact that you will be charged for a little amount of money.
In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned rationalizations into account, I personally uphold with this opinion that joining a group with an experienced tour leader is better than travelling alone, mainly because the leader knows the best intact locations of a city, especially if that city is historical. Furthermore, a satisfactory leader will optimise the expenses of the trip thanks to their well-established methods and approved relations in the destination. Provided that the leaders do not charge the passengers a hefty amount of money, the trip would be both pleasant and economically acceptable. Still, there are mutally exclusive notions regarding merits and demerits of following a leader; thus, neither are my identifications thoroughly true, nor must others' beliefs be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 76 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 83 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2693.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89636363636 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95553214294 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 853.2 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4934473878 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.736842105 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9473684211 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125626532896 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412133469172 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602247019578 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767050556143 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230316363672 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.