TPO 19 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In modern society, occurrences or events are usually demonstrated in different ways. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement that people should read various sources of news in order to correctly understand the information. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, each source of news may only refer to a specific aspect of the issue. This may be due to the fact that the source is only specialized in that field. Besides, the writer may neither comprehensively understand the event. As a result, people should seek other newspapers or magazines to grasp the idea. An event in my country exemplifies this idea. Last year, a magazine specialized in cosmetics published a controversial article on the effect of vaccination. It urged parents not to apply vaccines for their kids due to their side effects and many readers followed this suggestion. However, many doctors and medical specialists censured it and we later found out that the author of this piece of information did not comprehend correctly about the vaccination process.
Secondly, some newspapers receive remuneration from people to deliberately publish delusional information. As a result, these sponsored articles express the biased viewpoints of the people who paid for their publication. Consequently, readers are required to look for exact data from diverse sources. The latest election campaign in my country is a compelling example. The far-right party handed over a ton of cash to a variety of magazines to provide false information about their opponent peer with an intention to get more votes. In the first few weeks, they gained support from electorates. Nonetheless, voters then paid more attention to the details and knew the truth by poring over it from other reliable sources. They could not do this if they did not look for the fact from various sources.
In conclusion, those above-mentioned reasons and examples add weight to my view that an adequate conclusion about a matter can only be obtained after a thorough reading is implemented by the readers.
- TPO 21 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 23 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your 76
- TPO 19 - Many consumers ignore commercial advertisement. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing”. The advertisers hire people-buzzers-who personally promote (buzz) product to people they know or meet. The k 80
- TPO 26 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- TPO 39 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1783625731 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96792844036 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581871345029 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2037316271 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.55 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148968974668 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373485720173 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330518143045 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886046699509 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341656818327 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.