TPO 31 Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past

Essay topics:

TPO 31
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.

In the contemporary era, due to the fast-paced technology people are diligently trying to fulfill their needs and satisfy theirs covets to having new instruments which lunching every day. In this regard, a controversial question has been raised whether individuals are more satisfied with their today's life than antecedents or not. Some have the mindset that today's life is more convenient and contemporary people are living more delight in comparison with their antecedents. However, in my perspective past ones had more satisfactory living conditions. Thus, I try to substantiate my opinion through the following two paragraphs.
The first reason which deserves to be declared here is the issues of the living in the metropolises. Admittedly, today's people are dealing with the hustle and bustle of city life. Individuals who leave in the big cities have to get along with many problems such as heavy traffic, Inflation, air pollution, high-stress level, etc. On the other hand, people who left in the past had never dealing with such these problems in their life. Take my father as an example, he used to leave in a small town with a great nature. But when he first came to Tehran (the capital of Iran) he becomes used to living in a completely different situation. This makes the living circumstance hard for him, thereby he wishes to go back to his home town.
Another equally outstanding reason which I'm intended to point out here is that living expenses are dramatically high in modern life. It is mainly because of the rivalry between today's families. Many people are trying hard to fulfill their desires that they weren't an issue in the past. For instance, many individuals didn't use to have cars or some facilities like refrigerator or TV in the past. However, it is even unimaginable to live without these instruments. Therefore, living costs highly increased and forced people to work harder to prepare everything that modern life is required.
To wrap up, having analyzed the prior ideas, one can deduce that people had a more satisfactory life in the past compared to today's life. And it is not only because of the hustle and bustle of city life but also because of the increase in living expenses.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-17 Umme Abiha 75 view
2023-05-17 Umme Abiha 70 view
2023-04-19 Umme Abiha 60 view
2023-04-01 Hossein2000 90 view
2022-12-24 farjam 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Ali khorasani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ents or not. Some have the mindset that todays life is more convenient and contemporar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...nother equally outstanding reason which Im intended to point out here is that livi...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...hard to fulfill their desires that they werent an issue in the past. For instance, man...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he past. For instance, many individuals didnt use to have cars or some facilities lik...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...t. For instance, many individuals didnt use to have cars or some facilities like re...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95698924731 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74177735154 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7826996965 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208334130967 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655035596626 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497994815226 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131330243705 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401647891899 0.0645574589148 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.