TPO 36
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
There is no shortage of opinion which age of students regime should support for advancement of the nation. In my opinion, the education of the young children need to be more supported than learning of the older students. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, the learning process of individuals must be well developed during young ages for better attitude towards the school and knowledge. Students who were ambitious when they were younger tend to be aspiring when they become adults, which means that they will study in university successful. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I was in preschool, I studied lot of such necessary things as calculating, reading and value of good grade in a school. Thereby, topics of the first grade was comfortable and straightforward for me while other students were crying because they are homesick and could not comprehend the lesson and other matter. Afterwards, I have never confronted problems so far thanks to the things which I learned in preschool. Drawing from my own experience, excellent education of younger ages will lead to better destiny in the future.
Secondly, parents care for their children while they are studying in the university but younger ages. For this reason, government should not necessarily support the higher education since the aged are handling it appropriately for welfare of their offspring. Unfortunately, the teaching of young pupils are not cared by neither parents nor politics. Thereby, they spend entire time outside the school for unnecessary things such as playing and hanging out with friends. For instance, friend of mine whose parents did not teach him well, when he was eight years old, expended most of time by playing soccer. Afterwards, he started repeating grades because he did not gain sufficient knowledge when he was young. Moreover, he is not capable of concentrating on lesson and understanding topic although he has commitment of receiving full scale on the tests because he did not learn the most important part of education, time management and focusing. In conclusion, government should take care of younger pupils rather than graduates since attention of parents towards the older students is sufficient.
To sum up, learning of the children who is under ten years old need to be handled by the nation. This is because knowledge and savvy of the young age is significant part of the individuals' entire life and parents care their offspring when they graduate high school.
- TPO 36 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 47
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 76
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business Which would you choose to buy 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people enjoy life more than older people 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11860465116 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79345696921 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9992708259 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.05 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165999808394 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538727823236 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445331356935 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106047606132 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418863724259 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.