TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People usually inspire by learders who have a great skills in speaking, decision making, and hard woking. Some peole that leadership is a inner talent and can not be tought; others assume otherwise, believing that is just a skill and can be learnt by idividuals. Personally speaking, I support the latter group because of two reasons.
First, leadership is a skill and it can tought be in schools and universities. One of difference of leadership with other skills is that it involves a vast number of other skills. For being a successful leader, you must have a good speaking skill, decision-making skill, and a good skill in assessing situations. So, the leadership needs great efforts, but it is not impossible. When people learn mentioned skills, they can be a good leader. For example, my friend, Hamid, was a shy and quiet in high-school. He could not make right decision about his life, and because of that, he was always lecturing by teachers and his parents. Last year, I saw him talking for a big group of people as their leader in a sale company. Then, I bagan to text him about his leadership, he told me that he gained this skill by attending different classes at university. In sum, leadership is a skill that can be tought.
Second, leadership is a psycological state which people can learn by using psycological lessons. Being confident, tolerant, and observative are the most important features of a leader, and these feature related to unconcious part of people's personalities. A person can create this features by learning some psycological technique. For instance, I had a problem to leading myself to prepar for different exams. On day, I saw clip in Youtube about talking to youselves for increasing confidence and leadership. Then, I every told myself that I could manage myself. In sum, leadership is a unconcious state that can be implied.
In conclusion, I believe that leadership can be learnt because it is a skill and a psycological states.
- TPO51 Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
- TPO 39 Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 60
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 60
- sea otters TPO10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...ly inspire by learders who have a great skills in speaking, decision making, and hard ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d woking. Some peole that leadership is a inner talent and can not be tought; oth...
^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ld manage myself. In sum, leadership is a unconcious state that can be implied. ...
^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is a skill and a psycological states.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90718562874 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96329905851 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3161046859 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0476190476 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9047619048 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139000502036 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486757189734 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359023289481 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869915650517 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214288323699 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.