TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
<span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">There has been much discussion around the topic of people leadership abilities. One group of people believe that leadership comes naturally. On the other hand, others assert the leadership people can learn to be a leader. According to my experience and actual observation about life have led me to be </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">agreed</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> with those of people that thing leadership can be </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">learned</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">. I have </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">many reasons</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> to prove my point.
The first and foremost consequential reason is that people in life learn </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">a lot of things</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> about different fields and leadership can be </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">learned</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> too. </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">Most of</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">f the people that come from a long line of leaders don’t have guaranteed</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> to be a good leader in their life. One compelling example about leadership in govern country, I had the history class in the last semester and in the class, we talked about the one king that comes from a long line of king and ruler life, but he can’t control the country and always guide their people in wrong way. He wasn’t successful in political, commercial, international trade, international communications and other fields, which is important for governing the country and supply people’s need.
Another point that springing to mind is that, good leader must specialize in different field that can help they to managed their country or groups in the right </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">way, and</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> they have sufficient skill that people can trust him people don’t see just their natural ability about leadership field, but they see their knowledge, wisdom, and experiences in leadership field. Leaders that come from people and working a lot to specialize in a different field that can be a good leader be successful rather than those people that just because their ancestor be the leader. The good leader must have good relationships with other people and always can persuade them to choose to guide them
To sum it all up by taking all the detail into consideration, I think the good leader must come from ordinary people and have enough wisdom about the different field that can guide the country in a successful way. Leadership can be </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;">learned</span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"> and all the people can specialize in the necessary field and gain enough wisdom in a different field that led them and their people to successful ways.</span><br>
- Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary . 60
- Tpo27-Integrated writing 100
- TPO 48 73
- TPO-37-2Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 195, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a successful way" with adverb for "successful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ferent field that can guide the country in a successful way. Leadership can be ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3721.0 1977.66487455 188% => OK
No of words: 558.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.66845878136 4.8611393121 137% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.73296642821 2.67179642975 177% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.326164874552 0.524837075471 62% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 978.3 618.680645161 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.1344086022 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 183.033672978 48.9658058833 374% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 286.230769231 100.406767564 285% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.9230769231 20.6045352989 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554959810801 0.236089414692 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590819683957 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576995051872 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051740547653 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147651623387 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.4 11.7677419355 267% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 11.93 58.1214874552 21% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.10430107527 260% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.1575268817 217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 22.29 10.9000537634 204% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.0537634409 187% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.247311828 215% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.