Every year, graduates are faced with the difficulty of deciding their careers or jobs among a wide variety of choices. Some claims that it’s now easier for job-seekers to step into a promising career since they can easily get access to the Internet, while others assert that identifying a future job has been increasingly difficult. As for me, I side with the opinion that in the past, identifying a secure, successful job or career is much easier than it is now. Essential and persuasive evidence will be provided in the following paragraphs to verify my judgement.
Of all the reasons leading to my point, the development of technology is the most rudimentary. To be specific, more and more advanced technology has created some brand-new careers not heard decades ago, as well as eliminated a series of jobs which were once considered promising. A case in point is that with AI and other high technology developing at an incredible speed, enterprises are in desperate need of programmers. Another case in point is the typist, which was regarded secure, for you could always find someone who need typing words into computers. Apparently, this job is going to disappear nowadays, because most of citizens now process a computer and have the capacity to type. We are now experiencing such great development in science, technology and society, as a result, it’s inevitably hard to identify which career will always guarantee a bright future.
Besides, the fierce competition nowadays can also be applied to further explain why it’s almost impossible to identify such a promising job or career. Go back to the example of China, an emerging economy in which citizens are suffering from great pressure. As is reported, the fierce competition in job market is driving many employees to be fired, as well as requiring candidates to have higher education levels. According to historic data, graduates from universities were able to find relatively decent jobs in the 1990’s, which is definitely not the case in the 21st century. Since a great number of jobs have already been substituted by technology, vacancies become fewer and fewer, and thus the competition goes even more fierce. As a result, since job-seekers are faced with higher requirements and more fierce competition, it’s no doubt that they can hardly find a job guarantees a secure and successful future.
I have to concede that the use of the Internet has made different kind of information more available, which can to some extent help those job-seekers before they make the final decision. But since we are undoubted in a world filled with competition and fast-changing technology, uncertainty leads to the vagueness when searching for a career to devote to.
Simply put, it’s fairly safe to draw the conclusion that it’s more difficult and less likely to determine a future career which can guarantee a successful and secure life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the citizens') or simply say ''most citizens''.
Suggestion: most of the citizens; most citizens
...is going to disappear nowadays, because most of citizens now process a computer and have the cap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, if, so, thus, well, while, as for, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2463.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16352201258 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91689678524 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530398322851 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1719268554 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.631578947 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1052631579 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1879227473 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612587381932 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049606756267 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101782227316 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542700635574 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.