Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Being a controversial issue, whether the rules set for the young to follow are too rigid has aroused a great deal of attention during the past decades. Some argues that these rules are too strict we should allow teenagers to explore the world freely, while others suggest that rules be strictly set for young people to obey. As for me, I consider the rules to be necessary, rather than strict. Essential and persuasive evidence will be provided in the following paragraphs to verify my judgement.
Of all the reasons leading to my point, the fact that these rules help keep the society safe and secure is the most rudimentary. More specifically, without sufficient or even strict rules, the stability and harmony of the society cannot be assured. Go back to the example of China. In the 1970's, a great number of laws are badly established, and as a result, few regulations are provided to prevent non-grownups from doing harm to the society. According to the historic data from the government, we can clearly see the number of teenagers who once committed a crime is significantly higher than today. Another good case in point is that nowadays, more and more terrorists from mid-east are young people, who are not very well educated, and their countries fail to tell them what they should do and what they shouldn’t. Therefore, these two examples clearly illustrate that rules for the young can never be too strict to ensure the security and stability of the society.
Besides this, the tremendous benefits that these rules can bring for young people can also be applied to further explain why I render them to be of great importance, because they play a significant role in building and developing right values and principles. Before we human beings get to know what is right, we have to know what is prohibited and never allowed. Those rules are just there to tell young people what is right and valued. To be more specific, a teenager will never really know the necessity of being responsible until they are punished for breaking the rules and told to be responsible for their mis-behaviors. Additionally, one will never realize the importance of education if he has never been forced to leave their parents and study at kindergarten. As a result, complete and even rigid rules are necessary for the growth of a youngster, because it is based on these rules that valuable principles are formed.
It is true that there are a few drawbacks of too many rules. Some may argue, for example, that these strict rules have killed the innovative and creative ideas of young people. But as far as I am concerned, only after basic values and principles are stabilized in their mind can we encourage them to make full use of talent and imagination to create a better world. If the ladder is lean against the wrong wall, it will be disastrous to foster so-called creativity and innovation.
Simply put, it’s fairly safe to draw a conclusion that the rules set by the society are never too strict for the young to follow, because it will certainly benefit them by helping form basic principles inside themselves, as well as provide our society with stability and security.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 86
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2644.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 544.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86029411765 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67788424205 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501838235294 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5640157189 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.181818182 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203030830461 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642762722429 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523492900765 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129131304252 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556811915894 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.