TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of humanity, human beings have been tried to learn as much as possible about everything and it could not be possible without teachers to transcend knowledge from one generation to next one. Nowadays, from among all positions, teachers crucially important to society due to their vital role to educate children. Considering this, teachers deserve to be appreciated properly. There is a controversy amongst different people whether society appreciate and value teachers more nowadays in comparison with past or not.
To begin with, the advocates of the idea, which is teachers regarded more in past, contend that
with worldwide expansion of internet, there are more resources for learning and one can learn almost everything through internet. As a clear illustration, the internet provided quite a lot opportunities so much so that sometimes there is no need of schools. By replacing such methods of learning to teachers, value and attention to the teachers dramatically reduced, while students and society show natural inclination toward internet-based learning.
The proponents of the statement, mentioned, hold firmly to the belief that salary is a contributory factor in whether society appreciate one particular occupation or not. Statistics show the fact that there is direct relation between salary and attention occupations get. To get into detail, one who earns more money respected more by people and society. Nowadays, according to same statistics, teachers earn relatively little money in comparison with other jobs such as doctors, engineers, lawyers, and professors, to name but a few. in contrary, in past, being teacher classified as a high-class job and earn relatively much money unlike now. As a result, teachers respected and valued much more in past.
On the other hand, the adversaries of aforementioned idea argue that today, as it is commonly sensed, children are of considerable importance to their parents. Therefore, parents pay more attention to the education of them; consequently, teachers come into more consideration rather than past. To be more elaborate, since teachers have the most impact on students, parents and society do their best to find best teacher for the children and it means they respect more and more to teachers.
To put the issue into prospective, with all this taken into account, i would wholeheartedly assert that teachers valued and regarded more in the past on the ground that from my point of view I found the advocates assertion more cogent than those of the opponents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | naziii | 73 | view |
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 76
- TPO 40-Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- TPO 40 80
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?At present, movies and TV programs are influencing the youth in a bad way. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wadays in comparison with past or not. To begin with, the advocates of the idea...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e idea, which is teachers regarded more in past, contend that with worldwide expansio...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hers regarded more in past, contend that with worldwide expansion of internet, th...
^^^
Line 7, column 536, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ers, and professors, to name but a few. in contrary, in past, being teacher classi...
^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...essors, to name but a few. in contrary, in past, being teacher classified as a high-cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 699, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...teachers respected and valued much more in past. On the other hand, the adversaries ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the best'.
Suggestion: find the best
...s, parents and society do their best to find best teacher for the children and it means t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 70, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tive, with all this taken into account, i would wholeheartedly assert that teache...
^
Line 11, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'advocates'' or 'advocate's'?
Suggestion: advocates'; advocate's
... that from my point of view I found the advocates assertion more cogent than those of the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3523573201 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94610860899 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545905707196 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8295106199 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.882352941 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230269950005 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813551668573 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059195218896 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126665693119 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315334221984 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.