TPO 41
The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about new strict regulation for storing coal ash that United States government should adopt. Considering this, the Professor discusses advantages of strict regulation against releasing coal ash and how it could be a proper help to environment. The information she presents contradict facts outlined in the reading.
First, lecturer mentions that rules about liner-material are not sufficient enough since, companies just have to use liner on new ponds and new landfills but not necessarily for older ponds and landfills. Older landfills and ponds which are not use liner material can cause significant damage to environment due to leaking coal ash to ground water which is very harmful substance. On the other hand, according to the reading rules obligate companies to use liner in every new ponds and landfills which is useful in order that it prevent coal ash to leak into soil and ground water.
Moreover, the speaker states that such strict regulation would not stop consumers from using recycled ash and to offer supporting evidence, mentioned regulation for mercury as a perfect example for the idea. He explains how strict rules about storage and handling mercury lead to recycling it for nearly 50 years. However, the reading specified that consumers of recycled coal ash would be afraid from using it provided that new strict regulation establish.
furthermore, the professor points out that although new regulations make extra cost for companies which is approximately 15 billion dollars, but in average it will cost just 1 cent per person which is not so much for a safe environment. nonetheless, the reading makes it clear that general public will not be pleased by increasing electricity’s price which is direct result of new regulations.
To recapitulate, the author contend that new strict rule would not be effective, while the professor not only casts a doubt on it, but also allege that it new rules will be completely effective in order to have a clear environment.
- TPO 42 3
- TPO 40 80
- TPO 40-Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement?At present, movies and TV programs are influencing the youth in a bad way. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 90
- TPO 41 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...hat new strict regulation establish. furthermore, the professor points out that although...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nonetheless
... is not so much for a safe environment. nonetheless, the reading makes it clear that genera...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...heless, the reading makes it clear that general public will not be pleased by increasing elect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17717717718 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84955712904 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525525525526 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9347791854 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505349007369 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191992070158 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981785851573 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259844407066 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101189107076 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.