In my point of view, do similar task is more pleasant for workers because of some results.
To begin with, concentration is one aspect that must be noticed. When a worker work on same task every day he or she becomes more qualify in that task, so it is easier for him to do it than before. Furthermore, the workers could identify some new methods in their job to have efficiently more product. Moreover, it is time effective and costeffective for them. It is time effective since they when they become more qualify they do their job faster and can have some extra time to do other things. Previous point make the costeffective aspect more easily to understand, workers that have extra time can do another jobs and earn more money.
Some people think that a similar task will become boring after days. However, if a person do different task he or she could do more mistake and this mistake might annoy him or her, besides, the mistakes make some mind involvement. To make it obvious, an indivisuals might do a mistake that could have some bad effect on factory and because of that their boss do not rely on them anymore or lessen their income. In another way, different task might take more time and more efforts this could exhust workers. nowadays most of the workers have one task and it is rarely to find a worker with various tasks.
To sum up, depend on many aspect such as becoming qualify, time effectiveness, cost effectiveness, lower mistake, less mind involvement, it is more pleasant and satisfactory for workers to do similar task.
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 80
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 73
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mistake might annoy him or her, besides, the mistakes make some mind involvement....
^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowadays
...more efforts this could exhust workers. nowadays most of the workers have one task and i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun aspect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many aspects'.
Suggestion: many aspects
... various tasks. To sum up, depend on many aspect such as becoming qualify, time effectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, such as, more or less, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 273.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54110566401 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509157509158 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0936335621 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5384615385 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329169660081 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126801538894 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795588279905 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212025402545 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436109289045 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.