The author and the professor discuss about the European silver coin, the author states that the silver coin is not historical evidence and comes up with three reasons, which is challenged and refused by the lecturer one by one.
Primarily, an important point expressed by the author is that the place the coin was discovered is far from the site documenting the remains of Norse settlement, on the contrary, in accordance with the speaker, the reading ‘s claim doesn’t hold any water, because many other objects found in the Native American site came from other far places. The Native Americans loved to travel great distances and they were interested in obtaining objects from faraway places. Therefore, they could bring some silver coins back after the trip.
Secondly, the author states that people didn’t find other silver coins, which is conflicted with the lecturer who says that it is unnecessary to say the there was no other coins mean Norse didn’t bring coins with them. The Norse didn’t create permanent settlement in Native America. After they finished their voyage, they would pack up all the valuable things and bring back, so they would pack up all silver coins as well.
Finally, the author asserts that the Native American might not treat the silver coins as money like the Norse did, while the professor views that issue from an opposite angle. She claims that it is true that the Native American would not value the coins like the Norse did, but they valued the attractive unusual objects. The silver coins might have been very appealing because of its beauty. For example, they could have been used as necklace or other types of jewelry. As a result, the Norse could have used the coins to trade with the Native American.
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as a result, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98653198653 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3042261648 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.2347909121 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069805186717 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036301075199 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438121136664 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429956599997 0.150856017488 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263896212916 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.