TPO 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

TPO 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

In this modern age, using technology has made our life more convince than past. However, some people believe that group members should communicate with each other in person than using e-mail. In my opinion, working by e-mail instead of presence of people result in success more because of two reasons which will be discussed in this essay.

To begin with, people who want to attend to their project meeting are always be in the commute. To be more specific, many of them are become tired due to long distance travel, so they do not have sufficient productivity in their projects. However, using e-mail is not only so comfortable but also so fast, and people in the group can easily carry out their projects with considerable success. My cousin’s experience is a compelling example of this. He works for the Microsoft company as an engineer. Last month, he had an important project which he had forced to work with his co-workers face to face. He lived in the megacity and when he arrived the meeting, he was under enormous pressures due to frequent traffic jam. As a result, they could not have completed their project on-time because all members did not have a suitable mood. If the company had used e-mail instead of in person meeting, they would not have been tired and they have done on time.

Furthermore, in this modern age, time management skill has a significant importance in our life specially in performing projects. Indeed, the majority of people have their own problems such as being with their family members in their private life, so they cannot focus their projects. Simultaneously, they really save their time if they use e-mail than being in real meeting. For instance, when I was at the collage, I started my own family. I needed time that I could spend with my wife. My professor understood my terrible conditions in my life, so he excepted that I sent my task by e-mail for the group. After while, I not only could create an excellent life for my own, but also could achieve an unforgettable success in our project. Had I used face to face meeting, I could not have addressed my problems in my life and focused on my project.

In summarize, I firmly believe that colleagues or students are more successful when they use e-mail to communicate in their projects. This is because they do not need to travel in order to attend the meeting, and they can save their time to solve all aspects of their life.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-15 saharmnd 80 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 78 view
2023-02-26 hamidbrz 83 view
2023-02-18 zaid 83 view
2023-01-26 lolo_7 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user saeedeh1989 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...end to their project meeting are always be in the commute. To be more specific, ma...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... their project meeting are always be in the commute. To be more specific, many of them are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71596244131 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54177228743 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481220657277 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1310912481 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3181818182 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195029621655 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678910789555 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406280090044 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136799737609 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294418107499 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.